RAKESH KUMAR vs SAHIL AHUJA — 802/2025

Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 338. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT on 22nd March 2026.

Case disposed

MACT - M.A.C.T.

CNR: DLNT010159022025

Filing Number

11781/2025

Filing Date

28-Nov-2025

Registration No

802/2025

Registration Date

28-Nov-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

424-Presiding Off.-MACT

Decision Date

22-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALAT

Last updated 25-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act Section 338

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAKESH KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SAHIL AHUJA

  2. 2.AFSHA QADRI

  3. 3.TATA AIG GEN. INS. CO. LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 22-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  3. 12-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    In MACP No. 802/25, the MACT court recorded an amicable settlement between petitioner Rakesh Kumar and respondents (driver Sahil Ahuja, Afsha Qadri, and Tata AIG Insurance) for Rs. 25,000 as full and final compensation. The case was adjourned to Lok Adalat on 14.03.2026 for formalization of the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  7. 28-Nov-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  8. 28-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 28-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 802/2025

casestatus.in Summary

In MACP No. 802/25, the MACT court recorded an amicable settlement between petitioner Rakesh Kumar and respondents (driver Sahil Ahuja, Afsha Qadri, and Tata AIG Insurance) for Rs. 25,000 as full and final compensation. The case was adjourned to Lok Adalat on 14.03.2026 for formalization of the settlement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case