MASTER KRIYANSH (THROUGH HIS FATHER ATUL KR) vs SUSHIL KUMAR NOWAL — 766/2025

Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 338. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

MACT - M.A.C.T.

CNR: DLNT010153392025

Filing Number

11407/2025

Filing Date

17-Nov-2025

Registration No

766/2025

Registration Date

17-Nov-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

424-Presiding Off.-MACT

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISED

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act Section 338

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MASTER KRIYANSH (THROUGH HIS FATHER ATUL KR)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUSHIL KUMAR NOWAL

  2. 2.TATA AIG GEN. INS. CO. LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The MACT court passed a compromise award of Rs. 25,000 in favor of petitioner Master Kriyansh (through his father) against respondent Sushil Kumar Nowal and Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. for injuries suffered in a motor vehicle accident. The settlement was amicably agreed upon by both parties, with the insurance company offering the amount as full and final compensation, which was accepted by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  8. 17-Nov-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  9. 17-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 17-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 766/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The MACT court passed a compromise award of Rs. 25,000 in favor of petitioner Master Kriyansh (through his father) against respondent Sushil Kumar Nowal and Tata AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. for injuries suffered in a motor vehicle accident. The settlement was amicably agreed upon by both parties, with the insurance company offering the amount as full and final compensation, which was accepted by the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case