PUNJAB RELIABLE INVESTMENTS PVT LTD vs PDM RELIGIOUS AND EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION AND ORS — 77/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 13th March 2026.

T.P. Crl - Transfer Application(CRL)

CNR: DLNT010134302025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

05-10-2025

Filing Number

5387/2025

Filing Date

06-10-2025

Registration No

77/2025

Registration Date

08-10-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

466-Principal District and Sessions Judge, North

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT

FIR Details

Police Station

Adarsh Nagar

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448

Petitioner(s)

PUNJAB RELIABLE INVESTMENTS PVT LTD

Adv. MOHAN SHYAM

Respondent(s)

PDM RELIGIOUS AND EDUCATIONAL ASSOCIATION AND ORS

JOGINDER SINGH LATHER

BIJENDER SINGH LATHER

VIRENDER SINGH LATHER

BHAWANA LATHER

Hearing History

Judge: 466-Principal District and Sessions Judge, North

13-03-2026

Disposed

05-02-2026

Misc. cases/purpose

09-01-2026

Misc. cases/purpose

16-12-2025

Misc. cases/purpose

19-11-2025

Misc.Cases/purpose

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Case 77/2025 Summary The Delhi court dismissed Punjab Reliable Investments Pvt Ltd's transfer petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's complete lack of engagement. The petitioner failed to appear despite repeated court calls on multiple dates (05.09.2026 and 13.03.2026) and did not comply with the cost imposition order or file its receipt, resulting in dismissal and case closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case 77/2025 Summary The Delhi court dismissed Punjab Reliable Investments Pvt Ltd's transfer petition for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's complete lack of engagement. The petitioner failed to appear despite repeated court calls on multiple dates (05.09.2026 and 13.03.2026) and did not comply with the cost imposition order or file its receipt, resulting in dismissal and case closure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case