RAMESHWAR DASS (DECD.) THR. LR,S vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. (LAC-149/2022 HOLAMBI KALAN) — 500/2025

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 38. Disposed: Uncontested--SATISFIED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

EX. CIVIL - EXECUTION. CIVIL

CNR: DLNT010126092025

e-Filing Number

12-09-2025

Filing Number

9565/2025

Filing Date

15-Sep-2025

Registration No

500/2025

Registration Date

16-Sep-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

426-District Judge

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SATISFIED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 38

Petitioner(s)

1.RAMESHWAR DASS (DECD.) THR. LR,S

Adv. M C VERMA
2.NAVIN BHARDWAJ

Adv. M C VERMA

Respondent(s)

1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. (LAC-149/2022 HOLAMBI KALAN)
2.DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
15-May-2026

Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

The District Court disposed of the execution petition filed by Rameshwar Dass (through legal representatives) and Navin Bhardwaj against the Union of India and Delhi Development Authority after confirming that payment had been received and no stay orders were pending from higher courts. The District Nazir was directed to release the payment to the petitioner upon submission of necessary documents and completion of formalities, with the case being consigned to the record room. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
15-May-2026

Disposed

District Judge
13-Mar-2026

Misc. cases/purpose

District Judge
09-Jan-2026

Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
09-Jan-2026

Misc. cases/purpose

District Judge
14-Oct-2025

Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
14-Oct-2025

Misc. cases/purpose

District Judge
17-Sep-2025

Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
17-Sep-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
15-Sep-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 500/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The District Court disposed of the execution petition filed by Rameshwar Dass (through legal representatives) and Navin Bhardwaj against the Union of India and Delhi Development Authority after confirming that payment had been received and no stay orders were pending from higher courts. The District Nazir was directed to release the payment to the petitioner upon submission of necessary documents and completion of formalities, with the case being consigned to the record room. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.