RAJBIR vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANR (BAWANA 8/2001- — 89/2024

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 11. Disposed: Contested--PETITION IS ANSWERED on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

LAC - LAND ACQ. ACT

CNR: DLNT010125622024

Filing Number

9419/2024

Filing Date

27-Aug-2024

Registration No

89/2024

Registration Date

29-Aug-2024

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

426-District Judge

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PETITION IS ANSWERED

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 11

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJBIR

    Adv. VIJAY YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND ANR (BAWANA 8/2001-

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Copy Of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary of Case 89/2024 The District Judge enhanced Rajbir's land acquisition compensation for Village Bawana property from Rs.13.82 lakhs/acre to Rs.14.75 lakhs/acre (Category A) and Rs.14,38,125/acre (Category B), applying parity with precedent Jai Singh v. UOI. The petitioner received statutory benefits including 12% additional amount, 30% solatium, and interest at 9-15% per annum, but was denied interest during the court proceedings due to non-appearance for evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  6. 06-Apr-2026

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  7. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  8. 17-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  9. 09-Mar-2026

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  10. 13-Jan-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  11. 13-Jan-2026

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  12. 23-Dec-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  13. 23-Dec-2025

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  14. 25-Aug-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  15. 25-Aug-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  16. 25-Feb-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  17. 25-Feb-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  18. 29-Aug-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  19. 29-Aug-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 27-Aug-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 89/2024 The District Judge enhanced Rajbir's land acquisition compensation for Village Bawana property from Rs.13.82 lakhs/acre to Rs.14.75 lakhs/acre (Category A) and Rs.14,38,125/acre (Category B), applying parity with precedent Jai Singh v. UOI. The petitioner received statutory benefits including 12% additional amount, 30% solatium, and interest at 9-15% per annum, but was denied interest during the court proceedings due to non-appearance for evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case