STATE vs VIKAS KUMAR@HIPOP ETC — 712/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 34,323,308,341,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 25th March 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: DLNT010123192023

Filing Number

4501/2023

Filing Date

27-Jul-2023

Registration No

712/2023

Registration Date

30-Oct-2023

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

431-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

25-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

229

Police Station

Adarsh Nagar

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 34,323,308,341,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIKAS KUMAR@HIPOP ETC

  2. 2.KARAN@GOLU NEPALI

  3. 3.GAURAV@Gola

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judgment

    Case Summary: State v. Vikas Kumar @ Hipop and Others (SC 712/2023) The Additional Sessions Court acquitted all three accused persons (Vikas Kumar, Karan @ Golu, and Gaurav @ Gola) of charges under IPC Sections 308/323/341/506/34. The court found that the complainant and eye witness—the prosecution's primary witnesses—completely retracted their statements in court, denied the alleged assault occurred, failed to identify the accused, and provided no incriminating evidence. Despite thorough cross-examination, the witnesses remained uncooperative. Given the absence of technical/digital evidence and the material witnesses' failure to support the prosecution's case, the court held the prosecution miserably failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Additional Sessions Judge

  7. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  8. 14-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Additional Sessions Judge

  9. 10-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Additional Sessions Judge

  11. 23-Dec-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  12. 23-Dec-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  13. 13-Oct-2025

    Copy Of Order

  14. 13-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  15. 08-Jul-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  16. 08-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  17. 24-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  18. 19-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  19. 21-Aug-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  20. 21-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  21. 28-May-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  22. 11-Mar-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  23. 11-Mar-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  24. 16-Jan-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  25. 16-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  26. 30-Oct-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  27. 30-Oct-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 27-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 712/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Vikas Kumar @ Hipop and Others (SC 712/2023) The Additional Sessions Court acquitted all three accused persons (Vikas Kumar, Karan @ Golu, and Gaurav @ Gola) of charges under IPC Sections 308/323/341/506/34. The court found that the complainant and eye witness—the prosecution's primary witnesses—completely retracted their statements in court, denied the alleged assault occurred, failed to identify the accused, and provided no incriminating evidence. Despite thorough cross-examination, the witnesses remained uncooperative. Given the absence of technical/digital evidence and the material witnesses' failure to support the prosecution's case, the court held the prosecution miserably failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case