MANOJ vs VINOD AND ORS — 685/2022

Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 166,338. Disposed: Uncontested--COMPROMISED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

MACT - M.A.C.T.

CNR: DLNT010090562022

Filing Number

4182/2022

Filing Date

01-Oct-2022

Registration No

685/2022

Registration Date

06-Oct-2022

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

424-Presiding Off.-MACT

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--COMPROMISED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act Section 166,338

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ

    Adv. VIKAS KUMAR SINGHAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VINOD AND ORS

  2. 2.POOJA SHARMA W/O SH. VINOD

  3. 3.ROYAL SUNDARAM GEN. INSURANCE CO. LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    The MACT court approved an amicable settlement in the motor accident claim case, awarding Rs. 5,00,000 to petitioner Manoj for injuries sustained in an accident. The insurance company (Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd.) offered and accepted the settlement amount as full and final compensation, with the court passing a compromise award in favor of the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  6. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  7. 14-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  8. 02-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  9. 10-Jan-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  10. 05-Jan-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  11. 08-Dec-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  12. 08-Dec-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  13. 08-Sep-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  14. 08-Sep-2025

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  15. 02-Jul-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  16. 02-Jul-2025

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  17. 21-Apr-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  18. 21-Apr-2025

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  19. 30-Nov-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  20. 30-Nov-2024

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  21. 17-Aug-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  22. 17-Aug-2024

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  23. 05-Jun-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  24. 05-Jun-2024

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  25. 13-May-2024

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  26. 03-Apr-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  27. 03-Apr-2024

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  28. 14-Feb-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  29. 14-Feb-2024

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  30. 18-Dec-2023

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  31. 18-Dec-2023

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  32. 24-Aug-2023

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  33. 22-Apr-2023

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  34. 22-Apr-2023

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  35. 02-Mar-2023

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  36. 02-Mar-2023

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  37. 12-Dec-2022

    Misc. cases/purpose

    Presiding Off.-MACT

  38. 07-Oct-2022

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  39. 07-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  40. 01-Oct-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 685/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The MACT court approved an amicable settlement in the motor accident claim case, awarding Rs. 5,00,000 to petitioner Manoj for injuries sustained in an accident. The insurance company (Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd.) offered and accepted the settlement amount as full and final compensation, with the court passing a compromise award in favor of the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case