STATE vs MOHD. SHAVAJ alias MOHD. SHAHABAJ alias SHAHVAJ — 469/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,238(2). Status: Prosecution Evidence. Next hearing: 28th July 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: DLNT010089172025
Next Hearing
28th July 2026
Filing Number
4230/2025
Filing Date
05-06-2025
Registration No
469/2025
Registration Date
08-07-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC
Judge
431-Additional Sessions Judge
FIR Details
FIR Number
1201
Police Station
Narela Ind. Area
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
STATE
Respondent(s)
MOHD. SHAVAJ alias MOHD. SHAHABAJ alias SHAHVAJ
Hearing History
Judge: 431-Additional Sessions Judge
Prosecution Evidence
Prosecution Evidence
Arguments On Charge
Arguments On Charge
Arguments On Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-04-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 13-03-2026 | Prosecution Evidence |
| 29-01-2026 | Arguments On Charge |
| 06-12-2025 | Arguments On Charge |
| 28-10-2025 | Arguments On Charge |
Interim Orders
Case 469/2025 Summary: The bail application of accused Kanwal @ Kallu @ Kamal under Section 483 BNSS was dismissed on 28.04.2026. The court found that the accused played an active role in the alleged offense, with CCTV evidence placing him at Hotel Paradise post-incident and CDR data confirming his presence at the crime scene in constant contact with co-accused persons. The court rejected the accused's alibi plea as premature, noting the case was at an initial evidentiary stage with serious allegations warranting continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 469/2025 Summary: The bail application of accused Kanwal @ Kallu @ Kamal under Section 483 BNSS was dismissed on 28.04.2026. The court found that the accused played an active role in the alleged offense, with CCTV evidence placing him at Hotel Paradise post-incident and CDR data confirming his presence at the crime scene in constant contact with co-accused persons. The court rejected the accused's alibi plea as premature, noting the case was at an initial evidentiary stage with serious allegations warranting continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts