STATE vs MOHD. SHAVAJ alias MOHD. SHAHABAJ alias SHAHVAJ — 469/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,238(2). Status: Prosecution Evidence. Next hearing: 28th July 2026.

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: DLNT010089172025

Prosecution Evidence

Next Hearing

28th July 2026

Filing Number

4230/2025

Filing Date

05-06-2025

Registration No

469/2025

Registration Date

08-07-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

431-Additional Sessions Judge

FIR Details

FIR Number

1201

Police Station

Narela Ind. Area

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 108,238(2)

Petitioner(s)

STATE

Respondent(s)

MOHD. SHAVAJ alias MOHD. SHAHABAJ alias SHAHVAJ

Hearing History

Judge: 431-Additional Sessions Judge

25-04-2026

Prosecution Evidence

13-03-2026

Prosecution Evidence

29-01-2026

Arguments On Charge

06-12-2025

Arguments On Charge

28-10-2025

Arguments On Charge

Interim Orders

18-07-2025
COPY OF ORDER
28-04-2026
COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Case 469/2025 Summary: The bail application of accused Kanwal @ Kallu @ Kamal under Section 483 BNSS was dismissed on 28.04.2026. The court found that the accused played an active role in the alleged offense, with CCTV evidence placing him at Hotel Paradise post-incident and CDR data confirming his presence at the crime scene in constant contact with co-accused persons. The court rejected the accused's alibi plea as premature, noting the case was at an initial evidentiary stage with serious allegations warranting continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 469/2025 Summary: The bail application of accused Kanwal @ Kallu @ Kamal under Section 483 BNSS was dismissed on 28.04.2026. The court found that the accused played an active role in the alleged offense, with CCTV evidence placing him at Hotel Paradise post-incident and CDR data confirming his presence at the crime scene in constant contact with co-accused persons. The court rejected the accused's alibi plea as premature, noting the case was at an initial evidentiary stage with serious allegations warranting continued custody. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case