SATBIR SINGH (DECD. )THROUGH LR,S vs UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. (LAC-63/2023 BARWALA) — 268/2025

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 38. Disposed: Uncontested--SATISFIED on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed

EX. CIVIL - EXECUTION. CIVIL

CNR: DLNT010065302025

e-Filing Number

17-05-2025

Filing Number

5002/2025

Filing Date

19-May-2025

Registration No

268/2025

Registration Date

20-May-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

426-District Judge

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SATISFIED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SATBIR SINGH (DECD. )THROUGH LR,S

    Adv. M C VERMA

  2. 2.SATYWANTI

    Adv. M C VERMA

  3. 3.DEEPAK MANN

    Adv. M C VERMA

  4. 4.SURAJ MANN

    Adv. M C VERMA

  5. 5.ANITA DEVI

    Adv. M C VERMA

  6. 6.RENU

    Adv. M C VERMA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. (LAC-63/2023 BARWALA)

  2. 2.D.D.A

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

    The District Court disposed of the execution petition as satisfied after confirming that payment has been received and no stay orders from higher courts exist. The court directed the District Nazir to release the payment to the petitioner upon filing necessary documents and completing formalities, with the case file consigned to record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  5. 09-Jan-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  7. 12-Sep-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  8. 12-Sep-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  9. 21-May-2025

    Copy Of Order

  10. 21-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 19-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 268/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The District Court disposed of the execution petition as satisfied after confirming that payment has been received and no stay orders from higher courts exist. The court directed the District Nazir to release the payment to the petitioner upon filing necessary documents and completing formalities, with the case file consigned to record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case