RAM KISHAN (D )THR LR,S vs Union Of India AND ORS. (LAC-364/2019 BAWANA) — 181/2025

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section ORDER38. Disposed: Uncontested--SATISFIED on 15th May 2026.

EX. CIVIL - EXECUTION. CIVIL

CNR: DLNT010043072025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

03-04-2025

Filing Number

3392/2025

Filing Date

04-04-2025

Registration No

181/2025

Registration Date

05-04-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

426-District Judge

Decision Date

15th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--SATISFIED

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section ORDER38

Petitioner(s)

RAM KISHAN (D )THR LR,S

Adv. Suresh Yadav

BIR SINGH YADAV

Adv. Suresh Yadav

ROSHAN LALA

Adv. Suresh Yadav

SHAKUNTLA DEVI

Adv. Suresh Yadav

SAVITRI

Adv. Suresh Yadav

MURTI

Adv. Suresh Yadav

INDRAWATI

Adv. Suresh Yadav

YASHWANT RAI

Adv. Suresh Yadav

VIRENDER YADAV

Adv. Suresh Yadav

SAVITA

Adv. Suresh Yadav

SARITA

Adv. Suresh Yadav

HARSH YADAV

Adv. Suresh Yadav

ARMAAN YADAV

Adv. Suresh Yadav

AKSHRA YADAV

Adv. Suresh Yadav

Respondent(s)

Union Of India AND ORS. (LAC-364/2019 BAWANA)

D.U.S.I.B

Hearing History

Judge: 426-District Judge

15-05-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Misc. cases/purpose

06-03-2026

Misc. cases/purpose

09-01-2026

Misc. cases/purpose

31-10-2025

Misc. cases/purpose

Final Orders / Judgements

15-05-2026
COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

The court allowed the Application under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC and directed the District Nazir to release the payment to the petitioner upon filing necessary documents and completion of formalities, after confirming no stay order existed from higher courts. The execution petition was disposed of as satisfied and consigned to record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the Application under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC and directed the District Nazir to release the payment to the petitioner upon filing necessary documents and completion of formalities, after confirming no stay order existed from higher courts. The execution petition was disposed of as satisfied and consigned to record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case