ASHOK KUMAR vs DEVINDER KUMAR — 184/2026
Case under Motor Vehicle Act Section 166AND140. Status: Misc. cases/purpose. Next hearing: 06th August 2026.
MACT - M.A.C.T.
CNR: DLNT010027662026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
1979/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
184/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC
Judge
424-Presiding Off.-MACT
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ASHOK KUMAR
Adv. SANJEEV CHHIKARA
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEVINDER KUMAR
Case History
-
06-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-May-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
Case 184/2026 Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT-2) adjourned the case between Ashok Kumar (petitioner) and Devinder Kumar following a hearing on 15.05.2026. The petitioner was directed to clarify his residential address (found not to be at Samay Pur) and provide arguments against potential dismissal for lack of territorial jurisdiction; a fresh address verification from Shahbad Daulatpur was also ordered. The case was postponed to 06.08.2026 to allow the insurance company final opportunity to file their written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-May-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
Presiding Off.-MACT
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
Presiding Off.-MACT
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 184/2026
Case 184/2026 Summary: The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT-2) adjourned the case between Ashok Kumar (petitioner) and Devinder Kumar following a hearing on 15.05.2026. The petitioner was directed to clarify his residential address (found not to be at Samay Pur) and provide arguments against potential dismissal for lack of territorial jurisdiction; a fresh address verification from Shahbad Daulatpur was also ordered. The case was postponed to 06.08.2026 to allow the insurance company final opportunity to file their written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts