REKHA GEHLOT THR LRS vs Union Of India — 4/2025

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 18. Disposed: Contested--PETITION IS ANSWERED on 17th March 2026.

LAC - LAND ACQ. ACT

CNR: DLNT010026602025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

25-02-2025

Filing Number

2127/2025

Filing Date

27-02-2025

Registration No

4/2025

Registration Date

28-02-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

426-District Judge

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PETITION IS ANSWERED

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 18

Petitioner(s)

REKHA GEHLOT THR LRS

Respondent(s)

Union Of India

Hearing History

Judge: 426-District Judge

17-03-2026

Disposed

14-03-2026

Defendant/Respondent Evidence

02-03-2026

Defendant/Respondent Evidence

09-02-2026

Defendant/Respondent Evidence

01-12-2025

Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
COPY OF JUDGMENT

Case Summary: Rekha Gehlot v. Union of India (LAC 4/2025) The Delhi District Court enhanced land compensation for agricultural land acquired in Village Pansali for the Rohini Residential Scheme Phase IV&V. The court increased the fair market value from Rs. 12.16 lakhs per acre (determined by the Land Acquisition Collector) to Rs. 12.85 lakhs per acre, relying on a precedent case involving the same acquisition notification. The petitioner's legal representatives are entitled to this enhanced amount plus 12% additional amount, 30% solatium, and interest at 9% per annum for the first year and 15% thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Rekha Gehlot v. Union of India (LAC 4/2025) The Delhi District Court enhanced land compensation for agricultural land acquired in Village Pansali for the Rohini Residential Scheme Phase IV&V. The court increased the fair market value from Rs. 12.16 lakhs per acre (determined by the Land Acquisition Collector) to Rs. 12.85 lakhs per acre, relying on a precedent case involving the same acquisition notification. The petitioner's legal representatives are entitled to this enhanced amount plus 12% additional amount, 30% solatium, and interest at 9% per annum for the first year and 15% thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case