OM PRAKASH (DECD.) THROUGH LR,S vs UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS (LAC-27/2021 BAWANA) — 90/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 38. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

EX. CIVIL - EXECUTION. CIVIL

CNR: DLNT010025312026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2026

Filing Number

1807/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

90/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

426-District Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 38

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.OM PRAKASH (DECD.) THROUGH LR,S

    Adv. Subhash Sharawat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS (LAC-27/2021 BAWANA)

  2. 2.D.D.A

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    The court disposed of an execution petition relating to a judgment passed in favor of Om Prakash (deceased) against the Union of India regarding a land matter in Bawana. The respondent's counsel sought withdrawal of the execution without prejudice, stating intent to file a review petition since the original judgment had been passed in favor of a deceased person. The court allowed the withdrawal and ordered the file to be consigned to the record room. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 90/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court disposed of an execution petition relating to a judgment passed in favor of Om Prakash (deceased) against the Union of India regarding a land matter in Bawana. The respondent's counsel sought withdrawal of the execution without prejudice, stating intent to file a review petition since the original judgment had been passed in favor of a deceased person. The court allowed the withdrawal and ordered the file to be consigned to the record room. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case