STATE vs ARMAN — 404/2026

Case under Indian Penal Code. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Matters

CNR: DLNT010024632026

Filing Number

724/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

404/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

431-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

UNKNOWN

Police Station

Adarsh Nagar

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ARMAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    Case 404/2026 Summary The court disposed of Arman's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS after finding that no FIR had been registered against him and that he was neither wanted nor required in any police investigation. The court determined that police had not conducted any visit to his home or contacted him, making the anticipatory bail application moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Additional Sessions Judge

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Additional Sessions Judge

  7. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  8. 14-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Additional Sessions Judge

  9. 02-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Additional Sessions Judge

  10. 27-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  11. 27-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 404/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 404/2026 Summary The court disposed of Arman's anticipatory bail application under Section 482 BNSS after finding that no FIR had been registered against him and that he was neither wanted nor required in any police investigation. The court determined that police had not conducted any visit to his home or contacted him, making the anticipatory bail application moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case