SUSHIL KUMAR vs STATE ORS. — 80/2016
Case under The Indian Succession Act 1925. Disposed: Contested--PETITION ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
PC - PROBATE/LETTER OF ADMIN
CNR: DLNT010016132014
Filing Number
42448/2014
Filing Date
22-12-2014
Registration No
80/2016
Registration Date
24-03-2015
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC
Judge
426-District Judge
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PETITION ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SUSHIL KUMAR
Respondent(s)
STATE ORS.
B.M. SINGH
HARI RAJ SINGH
SUNIL KUMAR
MRS USHA PANU
Hearing History
Judge: 426-District Judge
Disposed
Final Argument
Final Argument
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 31-01-2026 | Final Argument |
| 06-12-2025 | Final Argument |
| 28-08-2025 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence |
| 24-05-2025 | Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Delhi District Court granted Letters of Administration to Sushil Kumar over his deceased mother's Delhi flat, finding that her registered will dated January 28, 2010 was validly executed in sound mind. The court rejected objections from another son (R-4) regarding alleged forgery and testamentary incapacity due to cancer, finding the petitioner's testimony corroborated by the attesting witness credible and noting R-4 presented no convincing evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The Delhi District Court granted Letters of Administration to Sushil Kumar over his deceased mother's Delhi flat, finding that her registered will dated January 28, 2010 was validly executed in sound mind. The court rejected objections from another son (R-4) regarding alleged forgery and testamentary incapacity due to cancer, finding the petitioner's testimony corroborated by the attesting witness credible and noting R-4 presented no convincing evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts