AMIT BHAGAT vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI — 10/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th April 2026.
T.P. Crl - Transfer Application(CRL)
CNR: DLNT010016122026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2026
Filing Number
492/2026
Filing Date
07-Feb-2026
Registration No
10/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC
Judge
466-Principal District and Sessions Judge, North
Decision Date
07-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
362
Police Station
Mukherji Nagar
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMIT BHAGAT
Adv. KIRAN
-
2.Amit Bhagat
Adv. KIRAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
-
2.THE SHO (Station House Officer)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
The court dismissed Amit Bhagat's petition to transfer FIR No. 362/2016 from ACJM Court to Mahila Court, finding the application devoid of merit. The court noted that the two related FIRs have different complainants, different charges, and the petitioner—an accused, not the complainant—sought transfer only to delay proceedings, with evidence of prior delaying tactics including intentional video conference appearances and adjournment requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District and Sessions Judge, North
-
18-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
18-Mar-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
Principal District and Sessions Judge, North
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Misc. cases/purpose
Principal District and Sessions Judge, North
-
10-Feb-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 10/2026
The court dismissed Amit Bhagat's petition to transfer FIR No. 362/2016 from ACJM Court to Mahila Court, finding the application devoid of merit. The court noted that the two related FIRs have different complainants, different charges, and the petitioner—an accused, not the complainant—sought transfer only to delay proceedings, with evidence of prior delaying tactics including intentional video conference appearances and adjournment requests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts