DAYA RAM (598- vs UOI (GHOGA) — 1256/2016

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894. Disposed: Uncontested--ABATED on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed

LAC - LAND ACQ. ACT

CNR: DLNT010015202012

Filing Number

35765/2012

Filing Date

17-Nov-2012

Registration No

1256/2016

Registration Date

12-Mar-2015

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

426-District Judge

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ABATED

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DAYA RAM (598-

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UOI (GHOGA)

  2. 2.DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

  3. 3.D.S.I.I.D.C

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    The court abated the proceedings in case 1256/2016 (Daya Ram v. UOI and others) because the legal representatives of the petitioner failed to file the required application under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC despite repeated opportunities. The case file was ordered to be consigned to the record room after necessary compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  7. 27-Jan-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  8. 28-Oct-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  10. 26-May-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  11. 26-May-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  12. 02-Dec-2024

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  13. 02-Dec-2024

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  14. 04-Jun-2024

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  15. 18-Dec-2023

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  16. 18-Dec-2023

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  17. 24-Jul-2023

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  18. 24-Jul-2023

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  19. 14-Feb-2023

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  20. 14-Feb-2023

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  21. 23-Aug-2022

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  22. 23-Aug-2022

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  23. 15-Mar-2022

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  24. 15-Mar-2022

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  25. 01-Nov-2021

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  26. 01-Nov-2021

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  27. 17-Aug-2021

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  28. 17-Aug-2021

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  29. 22-Apr-2021

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  30. 22-Apr-2021

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  31. 26-Nov-2020

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  32. 26-Nov-2020

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  33. 22-Jul-2020

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  34. 22-Jul-2020

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  35. 27-May-2020

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  36. 08-Apr-2020

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  37. 08-Nov-2019

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  38. 08-Nov-2019

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  39. 22-Apr-2019

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  40. 12-Dec-2018

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  41. 12-Dec-2018

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  42. 13-Aug-2018

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  43. 13-Aug-2018

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  44. 17-Apr-2017

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    ADJ

  45. 02-Nov-2016

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  46. 02-Nov-2016

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    ADJ

  47. 14-Sep-2016

    Misc. cases/purpose

    ADJ

  48. 07-Sep-2016

    Misc. cases/purpose

    ADJ

  49. 05-Jul-2016

    Misc. cases/purpose

    ADJ

  50. 28-Apr-2016

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  51. 28-Apr-2016

    Misc. cases/purpose

    ADJ

  52. 13-Jan-2016

    Misc. cases/purpose

    ADJ

  53. 10-Sep-2015

    Misc. cases/purpose

    ADJ

  54. 21-Jul-2015

    Misc. Arguments

    ADJ

  55. 29-Apr-2015

    Misc. Arguments

    ADJ

  56. 07-Oct-2014

    Misc. Arguments

  57. 02-Apr-2014

    Misc. cases/purpose

  58. 16-Dec-2013

    Misc. cases/purpose

  59. 29-Jul-2013

    Misc. cases/purpose

  60. 20-Mar-2013

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  61. 17-Nov-2012

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1256/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The court abated the proceedings in case 1256/2016 (Daya Ram v. UOI and others) because the legal representatives of the petitioner failed to file the required application under Order 22 Rule 3 CPC despite repeated opportunities. The case file was ordered to be consigned to the record room after necessary compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case