RAJ SINGH (1099- vs UNION OF INDIA (SANOTH) — 118/2016

Case under Land Acquisition Act 1894. Disposed: Contested--PETITION IS ANSWERED on 06th June 2026.

Case disposed

LAC - LAND ACQ. ACT

CNR: DLNT010001782013

Filing Number

27491/2013

Filing Date

10-Sep-2013

Registration No

118/2016

Registration Date

11-May-2015

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North, RHC

Judge

426-District Judge

Decision Date

06-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--PETITION IS ANSWERED

Last updated 29-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act 1894

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJ SINGH (1099-

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA (SANOTH)

  2. 2.D.SI.I.D.C

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Jun-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  3. 06-Jun-2026

    Copy Of Judgment

    Case Summary: Raj Singh v. Union of India (LAC 118/2016) The court enhanced land compensation for agricultural land acquired in Village Sanoth, Delhi. The Land Acquisition Collector had valued the land at Rs. 2,33,333 per bigha (Category A), but the court increased the fair market value to Rs. 11,41,466 per acre, relying on a comparable prior judgment involving the same village and notification. The petitioner's legal representatives were also granted statutory benefits including 12% additional amount, 30% solatium, and interest at 9-15% per annum under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  5. 02-Jun-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  6. 02-Jun-2026

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  7. 18-May-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  8. 18-May-2026

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  9. 24-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  10. 24-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  11. 16-Feb-2026

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  12. 09-Dec-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  13. 09-Dec-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  14. 19-Aug-2025

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  15. 19-Aug-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  16. 22-Apr-2025

    Copy Of Order

  17. 22-Apr-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  18. 20-Jan-2025

    Copy Of Order

  19. 20-Jan-2025

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  20. 30-Jul-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  21. 30-Jul-2024

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  22. 29-Jan-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  23. 29-Jan-2024

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  24. 25-Sep-2023

    Copy Of Order

  25. 25-Sep-2023

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  26. 25-Jul-2023

    Copy Of Order

  27. 25-Jul-2023

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  28. 10-Apr-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  29. 10-Apr-2023

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  30. 01-Dec-2022

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  31. 01-Dec-2022

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  32. 08-Sep-2022

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  33. 08-Sep-2022

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  34. 14-Mar-2022

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  35. 14-Mar-2022

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  36. 01-Nov-2021

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  37. 01-Nov-2021

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  38. 11-Aug-2021

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  39. 11-Aug-2021

    Misc. cases/purpose

    District Judge

  40. 20-Apr-2021

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  41. 20-Apr-2021

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  42. 01-Feb-2021

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  43. 01-Feb-2021

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  44. 17-Aug-2020

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  45. 17-Aug-2020

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  46. 15-Jun-2020

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  47. 27-Apr-2020

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  48. 08-Nov-2019

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  49. 08-Nov-2019

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  50. 17-May-2019

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  51. 17-May-2019

    Defendant/Respondent Evidence

    District Judge

  52. 14-Feb-2019

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  53. 14-Feb-2019

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  54. 13-Nov-2018

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  55. 13-Nov-2018

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  56. 24-Aug-2018

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  57. 19-Jul-2018

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    District Judge

  58. 28-Mar-2017

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    ADJ

  59. 23-Mar-2016

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    ADJ

  60. 11-May-2015

    Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence

    ADJ

  61. 03-Nov-2014

    Misc. cases/purpose

  62. 08-Jul-2014

    Misc. cases/purpose

  63. 14-Jan-2014

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  64. 10-Sep-2013

    Case filed

    Registration No. 118/2016

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Raj Singh v. Union of India (LAC 118/2016) The court enhanced land compensation for agricultural land acquired in Village Sanoth, Delhi. The Land Acquisition Collector had valued the land at Rs. 2,33,333 per bigha (Category A), but the court increased the fair market value to Rs. 11,41,466 per acre, relying on a comparable prior judgment involving the same village and notification. The petitioner's legal representatives were also granted statutory benefits including 12% additional amount, 30% solatium, and interest at 9-15% per annum under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case