ALI AHMED vs MAQSOOD ALI — 2/2026
Case under Suit for Declaration Section 96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 28th April 2026.
RCA DJ - REG CIVIL APPEAL FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLNE010034592025
e-Filing Number
17-11-2025
Filing Number
1754/2025
Filing Date
18-11-2025
Registration No
2/2026
Registration Date
19-11-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD
Judge
429-District Judge
Decision Date
28th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ALI AHMED
Adv. jagdish pershad
Respondent(s)
MAQSOOD ALI
Hearing History
Judge: 429-District Judge
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-04-2026 | Order |
| 24-04-2026 | Order |
| 13-04-2026 | Order |
| 01-04-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Ali Ahmed v. Maqsood Ali (RCA DJ 2/26) District Judge Aashish Gupta upheld the trial court's possession decree in favor of landlord Ali Ahmed against tenant Maqsood Ali over the second floor of a Delhi property. The court found that Maqsood admitted entering as a tenant and thus remained a tenant despite claiming he paid ₹7.65 lac for eventual ownership—applying the principle "once a tenant, always a tenant." Since the disputed floor was constructed after September 2021, it fell outside the Delhi Rent Control Act's 10-year protection period, allowing eviction without rent control restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Ali Ahmed v. Maqsood Ali (RCA DJ 2/26) District Judge Aashish Gupta upheld the trial court's possession decree in favor of landlord Ali Ahmed against tenant Maqsood Ali over the second floor of a Delhi property. The court found that Maqsood admitted entering as a tenant and thus remained a tenant despite claiming he paid ₹7.65 lac for eventual ownership—applying the principle "once a tenant, always a tenant." Since the disputed floor was constructed after September 2021, it fell outside the Delhi Rent Control Act's 10-year protection period, allowing eviction without rent control restrictions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts