UMESH KUMAR vs RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN — 57/2025
Case under Suit for Declaration Section 96. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
RCA DJ - REG CIVIL APPEAL FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLNE010033482025
e-Filing Number
11-11-2025
Filing Number
1704/2025
Filing Date
11-Nov-2025
Registration No
57/2025
Registration Date
11-Nov-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD
Judge
429-District Judge
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UMESH KUMAR
Adv. Hitendar Mahalwal
-
2.Pooja
Adv. Hitendar Mahalwal
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: RCA 57/25 (Umesh Kumar & Pooja v. Ravinder Kumar Jain) The appellate court allowed plaintiffs' appeal and increased the award from Rs. 1,58,000 to Rs. 2,02,350 on the ground that the defendant had admitted receiving Rs. 2,75,400 as a friendly loan and the trial court erroneously rejected bank statement evidence that defendant had not disputed. The court found defendant's counterclaim of giving a Rs. 2.5 lac cash loan unsupported by evidence and rejected it, holding plaintiffs entitled to recover the net amount after crediting Rs. 73,050 already repaid, along with 8% annual interest from filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
02-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge
-
17-Feb-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
17-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge
-
31-Jan-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
31-Jan-2026
Order
District Judge
-
24-Jan-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
24-Jan-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
12-Nov-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
12-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 57/2025
Case Summary: RCA 57/25 (Umesh Kumar & Pooja v. Ravinder Kumar Jain) The appellate court allowed plaintiffs' appeal and increased the award from Rs. 1,58,000 to Rs. 2,02,350 on the ground that the defendant had admitted receiving Rs. 2,75,400 as a friendly loan and the trial court erroneously rejected bank statement evidence that defendant had not disputed. The court found defendant's counterclaim of giving a Rs. 2.5 lac cash loan unsupported by evidence and rejected it, holding plaintiffs entitled to recover the net amount after crediting Rs. 73,050 already repaid, along with 8% annual interest from filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts