UMESH KUMAR vs RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN — 57/2025

Case under Suit for Declaration Section 96. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.

RCA DJ - REG CIVIL APPEAL FOR DJ ADJ

CNR: DLNE010033482025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-11-2025

Filing Number

1704/2025

Filing Date

11-11-2025

Registration No

57/2025

Registration Date

11-11-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD

Judge

429-District Judge

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Suit For Declaration Section 96

Petitioner(s)

UMESH KUMAR

Adv. Hitendar Mahalwal

Pooja

Adv. Hitendar Mahalwal

Respondent(s)

RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN

Hearing History

Judge: 429-District Judge

14-03-2026

Disposed

02-03-2026

Order

17-02-2026

Order

31-01-2026

Order

24-01-2026

Misc. cases

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER
14-03-2026
COPY OF JUDGMENT

Case Summary: RCA 57/25 (Umesh Kumar & Pooja v. Ravinder Kumar Jain) The appellate court allowed plaintiffs' appeal and increased the award from Rs. 1,58,000 to Rs. 2,02,350 on the ground that the defendant had admitted receiving Rs. 2,75,400 as a friendly loan and the trial court erroneously rejected bank statement evidence that defendant had not disputed. The court found defendant's counterclaim of giving a Rs. 2.5 lac cash loan unsupported by evidence and rejected it, holding plaintiffs entitled to recover the net amount after crediting Rs. 73,050 already repaid, along with 8% annual interest from filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

12-11-2025
COPY OF ORDER
24-01-2026
COPY OF ORDER
31-01-2026
COPY OF ORDER
17-02-2026
COPY OF ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCA 57/25 (Umesh Kumar & Pooja v. Ravinder Kumar Jain) The appellate court allowed plaintiffs' appeal and increased the award from Rs. 1,58,000 to Rs. 2,02,350 on the ground that the defendant had admitted receiving Rs. 2,75,400 as a friendly loan and the trial court erroneously rejected bank statement evidence that defendant had not disputed. The court found defendant's counterclaim of giving a Rs. 2.5 lac cash loan unsupported by evidence and rejected it, holding plaintiffs entitled to recover the net amount after crediting Rs. 73,050 already repaid, along with 8% annual interest from filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case