UMESH KUMAR vs RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN — 57/2025
Case under Suit for Declaration Section 96. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
RCA DJ - REG CIVIL APPEAL FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLNE010033482025
e-Filing Number
11-11-2025
Filing Number
1704/2025
Filing Date
11-11-2025
Registration No
57/2025
Registration Date
11-11-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD
Judge
429-District Judge
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UMESH KUMAR
Adv. Hitendar Mahalwal
Pooja
Adv. Hitendar Mahalwal
Respondent(s)
RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN
Hearing History
Judge: 429-District Judge
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Misc. cases
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-03-2026 | Order |
| 17-02-2026 | Order |
| 31-01-2026 | Order |
| 24-01-2026 | Misc. cases |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCA 57/25 (Umesh Kumar & Pooja v. Ravinder Kumar Jain) The appellate court allowed plaintiffs' appeal and increased the award from Rs. 1,58,000 to Rs. 2,02,350 on the ground that the defendant had admitted receiving Rs. 2,75,400 as a friendly loan and the trial court erroneously rejected bank statement evidence that defendant had not disputed. The court found defendant's counterclaim of giving a Rs. 2.5 lac cash loan unsupported by evidence and rejected it, holding plaintiffs entitled to recover the net amount after crediting Rs. 73,050 already repaid, along with 8% annual interest from filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCA 57/25 (Umesh Kumar & Pooja v. Ravinder Kumar Jain) The appellate court allowed plaintiffs' appeal and increased the award from Rs. 1,58,000 to Rs. 2,02,350 on the ground that the defendant had admitted receiving Rs. 2,75,400 as a friendly loan and the trial court erroneously rejected bank statement evidence that defendant had not disputed. The court found defendant's counterclaim of giving a Rs. 2.5 lac cash loan unsupported by evidence and rejected it, holding plaintiffs entitled to recover the net amount after crediting Rs. 73,050 already repaid, along with 8% annual interest from filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts