SURENDRA GIRI vs BITU — 56/2025
Case under Suit for Declaration Section APPEALUNDERSECTION96. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.
RCA DJ - REG CIVIL APPEAL FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLNE010032882025
e-Filing Number
04-11-2025
Filing Number
1668/2025
Filing Date
04-Nov-2025
Registration No
56/2025
Registration Date
07-Nov-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD
Judge
429-District Judge
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURENDRA GIRI
Adv. Maya Rani
Respondent(s)
-
1.BITU
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy Of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Surendra Giri v. Bitu (RCA DJ 56/25) The appellate court reversed the trial court's dismissal of the defendant's leave-to-defend application in a loan recovery suit. While the plaintiff claimed a ₹2 lakh friendly loan, the defendant admitted borrowing only ₹1.5 lakh and claimed to have repaid ₹1 lakh, disputing the remainder. The court held that the defendant's defense, though lacking documentary support and specific repayment dates, constituted a fair/reasonable defense rather than a frivolous one. The court awarded the plaintiff a partial decree of ₹50,000 (the amount admitted by defendant) with 6% interest, and granted the defendant unconditional leave to defend regarding the remaining ₹1.5 lakh claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
20-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge
-
09-Feb-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
09-Feb-2026
Order
District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
29-Jan-2026
Order
District Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
11-Nov-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
11-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 56/2025
Case Summary: Surendra Giri v. Bitu (RCA DJ 56/25) The appellate court reversed the trial court's dismissal of the defendant's leave-to-defend application in a loan recovery suit. While the plaintiff claimed a ₹2 lakh friendly loan, the defendant admitted borrowing only ₹1.5 lakh and claimed to have repaid ₹1 lakh, disputing the remainder. The court held that the defendant's defense, though lacking documentary support and specific repayment dates, constituted a fair/reasonable defense rather than a frivolous one. The court awarded the plaintiff a partial decree of ₹50,000 (the amount admitted by defendant) with 6% interest, and granted the defendant unconditional leave to defend regarding the remaining ₹1.5 lakh claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts