RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN vs UMESH KUMAR — 45/2025
Case under Suit for Declaration Section 96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 14th March 2026.
RCA DJ - REG CIVIL APPEAL FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLNE010029112025
e-Filing Number
26-09-2025
Filing Number
1487/2025
Filing Date
27-09-2025
Registration No
45/2025
Registration Date
08-10-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD
Judge
429-District Judge
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN
Adv. VINOD KUMAR
Respondent(s)
UMESH KUMAR
POOJA
Hearing History
Judge: 429-District Judge
Disposed
Order
Order
Order
Misc. cases
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-03-2026 | Order |
| 17-02-2026 | Order |
| 31-01-2026 | Order |
| 24-01-2026 | Misc. cases |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: RCA DJ 45/25 Ravinder Kumar Jain v. Umesh Kumar & Pooja The appellate court modified the trial court's judgment, increasing the award to plaintiffs from Rs. 1,58,000 to Rs. 2,02,350 plus 8% simple interest. The defendant had admitted receiving Rs. 2,75,400 as a friendly loan from plaintiffs; after crediting Rs. 73,050 returned by the defendant, plaintiffs were entitled to the full balance. The court rejected the defendant's unsubstantiated defense of a Rs. 2.5 lakh cash loan, finding it vague, unsupported by documentary evidence, and inconsistent with his failure to file a counterclaim or separate suit for recovery. Both cross-appeals were resolved in plaintiffs' favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCA DJ 45/25 Ravinder Kumar Jain v. Umesh Kumar & Pooja The appellate court modified the trial court's judgment, increasing the award to plaintiffs from Rs. 1,58,000 to Rs. 2,02,350 plus 8% simple interest. The defendant had admitted receiving Rs. 2,75,400 as a friendly loan from plaintiffs; after crediting Rs. 73,050 returned by the defendant, plaintiffs were entitled to the full balance. The court rejected the defendant's unsubstantiated defense of a Rs. 2.5 lakh cash loan, finding it vague, unsupported by documentary evidence, and inconsistent with his failure to file a counterclaim or separate suit for recovery. Both cross-appeals were resolved in plaintiffs' favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts