RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN vs UMESH KUMAR — 45/2025

Case under Suit for Declaration Section 96. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 14th March 2026.

RCA DJ - REG CIVIL APPEAL FOR DJ ADJ

CNR: DLNE010029112025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

26-09-2025

Filing Number

1487/2025

Filing Date

27-09-2025

Registration No

45/2025

Registration Date

08-10-2025

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD

Judge

429-District Judge

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Suit For Declaration Section 96

Petitioner(s)

RAVINDER KUMAR JAIN

Adv. VINOD KUMAR

Respondent(s)

UMESH KUMAR

POOJA

Hearing History

Judge: 429-District Judge

14-03-2026

Disposed

02-03-2026

Order

17-02-2026

Order

31-01-2026

Order

24-01-2026

Misc. cases

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
COPY OF ORDER
14-03-2026
COPY OF JUDGMENT

Case Summary: RCA DJ 45/25 Ravinder Kumar Jain v. Umesh Kumar & Pooja The appellate court modified the trial court's judgment, increasing the award to plaintiffs from Rs. 1,58,000 to Rs. 2,02,350 plus 8% simple interest. The defendant had admitted receiving Rs. 2,75,400 as a friendly loan from plaintiffs; after crediting Rs. 73,050 returned by the defendant, plaintiffs were entitled to the full balance. The court rejected the defendant's unsubstantiated defense of a Rs. 2.5 lakh cash loan, finding it vague, unsupported by documentary evidence, and inconsistent with his failure to file a counterclaim or separate suit for recovery. Both cross-appeals were resolved in plaintiffs' favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

10-10-2025
COPY OF ORDER
04-11-2025
COPY OF ORDER
15-12-2025
COPY OF ORDER
09-01-2026
COPY OF ORDER
23-01-2026
COPY OF ORDER
24-01-2026
COPY OF ORDER
31-01-2026
COPY OF ORDER
17-02-2026
COPY OF ORDER
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCA DJ 45/25 Ravinder Kumar Jain v. Umesh Kumar & Pooja The appellate court modified the trial court's judgment, increasing the award to plaintiffs from Rs. 1,58,000 to Rs. 2,02,350 plus 8% simple interest. The defendant had admitted receiving Rs. 2,75,400 as a friendly loan from plaintiffs; after crediting Rs. 73,050 returned by the defendant, plaintiffs were entitled to the full balance. The court rejected the defendant's unsubstantiated defense of a Rs. 2.5 lakh cash loan, finding it vague, unsupported by documentary evidence, and inconsistent with his failure to file a counterclaim or separate suit for recovery. Both cross-appeals were resolved in plaintiffs' favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case