STATE vs NAUSHAD — 275/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 302,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: DLNE010028712022

Filing Number

1580/2022

Filing Date

12-Sep-2022

Registration No

275/2022

Registration Date

12-Sep-2022

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD

Judge

5-Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

601

Police Station

New Usman Pur

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 302,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NAUSHAD

  2. 2.KAMRUDDIN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Copy Of Order

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Copy Of Judgment

    Case Summary: State v. Naushad & Kamruddin (Sessions Case 275/2022) Court's Decision: ACQUITTAL The Delhi Special Judge acquitted both accused Naushad and Kamruddin of murder charges (IPC §302/34) due to insufficient evidence proving their guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Although the deceased suffered fatal blunt-force abdominal injuries, the prosecution failed to establish the accused's identity as the assailants, relying primarily on hearsay witnesses who weren't present at the incident and one eyewitness who couldn't identify the perpetrators. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  5. 20-May-2026

    Copy Of Order

  6. 20-May-2026

    Judgement

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  7. 25-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Order

  8. 25-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  9. 08-Apr-2026

    Copy Of Order

  10. 08-Apr-2026

    Final Arguments

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  11. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Order

  12. 17-Mar-2026

    Final Arguments

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  13. 25-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Order

  14. 25-Feb-2026

    Statement of Accused

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  15. 11-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Order

  16. 11-Feb-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  17. 26-Nov-2025

    Copy Of Order

  18. 26-Nov-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  19. 06-Sep-2025

    Copy Of Order

  20. 06-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  21. 23-Aug-2025

    Copy Of Order

  22. 23-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  23. 31-May-2025

    Copy Of Order

  24. 31-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  25. 15-May-2025

    Copy Of Order

  26. 15-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  27. 14-May-2025

    Copy Of Order

  28. 14-May-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  29. 03-Apr-2025

    Copy Of Order

  30. 03-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  31. 04-Feb-2025

    Copy Of Order

  32. 04-Feb-2025

    Copy Of Order

  33. 04-Feb-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  34. 12-Nov-2024

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  35. 12-Nov-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  36. 11-Nov-2024

    Copy Of Order

  37. 06-Aug-2024

    Copy Of Order

  38. 06-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  39. 02-Aug-2024

    Copy Of Order

  40. 02-Aug-2024

    Copy Of Order

  41. 02-Aug-2024

    Copy Of Order

  42. 02-Aug-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  43. 30-Jul-2024

    Copy Of Order

  44. 06-May-2024

    Copy Of Order

  45. 06-May-2024

    Copy Of Order

  46. 29-Apr-2024

    Copy Of Order

  47. 16-Apr-2024

    Copy Of Order

  48. 16-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  49. 15-Apr-2024

    Copy Of Order

  50. 15-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  51. 11-Jan-2024

    Copy Of Order

  52. 11-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  53. 06-Jan-2024

    Copy Of Order

  54. 06-Jan-2024

    Copy Of Order

  55. 05-Jan-2024

    Copy Of Order

  56. 05-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  57. 03-Jan-2024

    Copy Of Order

  58. 03-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  59. 17-Nov-2023

    Copy Of Order

  60. 02-Nov-2023

    Copy Of Order

  61. 02-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  62. 01-Nov-2023

    Copy Of Judicial Proceedings

  63. 01-Nov-2023

    Copy Of Order

  64. 01-Nov-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  65. 04-Sep-2023

    Copy Of Order

  66. 04-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  67. 28-Aug-2023

    Copy Of Order

  68. 28-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  69. 27-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  70. 18-Mar-2023

    Copy Of Order

  71. 18-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  72. 06-Dec-2022

    Copy Of Order

  73. 06-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  74. 02-Dec-2022

    Copy Of Order

  75. 02-Dec-2022

    Order

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  76. 23-Nov-2022

    Copy Of Order

  77. 23-Nov-2022

    Order

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  78. 31-Oct-2022

    Copy Of Order

  79. 31-Oct-2022

    Charge

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  80. 16-Sep-2022

    Copy Of Order

  81. 16-Sep-2022

    Charge

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  82. 12-Sep-2022

    Copy Of Order

  83. 12-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  84. 12-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 275/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Naushad & Kamruddin (Sessions Case 275/2022) Court's Decision: ACQUITTAL The Delhi Special Judge acquitted both accused Naushad and Kamruddin of murder charges (IPC §302/34) due to insufficient evidence proving their guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Although the deceased suffered fatal blunt-force abdominal injuries, the prosecution failed to establish the accused's identity as the assailants, relying primarily on hearsay witnesses who weren't present at the incident and one eyewitness who couldn't identify the perpetrators. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case