USHA BHARDWAJ vs ASHA — 358/2025
Case under Suit for Declaration Section CPC. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 21st April 2026.
CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLNE010028702025
e-Filing Number
23-09-2025
Filing Number
1469/2025
Filing Date
24-Sep-2025
Registration No
358/2025
Registration Date
08-Oct-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD
Judge
429-District Judge
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.USHA BHARDWAJ
Adv. AMAN MATHUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASHA
-
2.PUSHPA
-
3.DARSHANA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
The court rejected the plaint filed by Usha Bhardwaj against Asha, Pushpa, and Darshana under Order VII Rule 11(b) CPC due to the plaintiff's failure to properly value the suit for pecuniary jurisdiction purposes despite repeated opportunities. The valuation paragraph contained blank spaces, preventing the court from establishing necessary jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
29-Jan-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
28-Nov-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
28-Nov-2025
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
10-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 358/2025
The court rejected the plaint filed by Usha Bhardwaj against Asha, Pushpa, and Darshana under Order VII Rule 11(b) CPC due to the plaintiff's failure to properly value the suit for pecuniary jurisdiction purposes despite repeated opportunities. The valuation paragraph contained blank spaces, preventing the court from establishing necessary jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts