STATE vs ASIF — 244/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 307,34. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED BUT RELEASED AS ALREADY UNDERGONE on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: DLNE010024792022

Filing Number

1381/2022

Filing Date

08-Aug-2022

Registration No

244/2022

Registration Date

08-Aug-2022

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD

Judge

423-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONVICTED BUT RELEASED AS ALREADY UNDERGONE

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

318

Police Station

Khajuri Khas

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 307,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ASIF

  2. 2.AFSAR KURAISHI

  3. 3.MOHD SHAKIL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: STATE v. ASIF (SC 244/2022) The court sentenced three convicts (Asif, Afsar Kuraishi, and Mohd Shakil) to imprisonment for the period already undergone during investigation and trial, plus Rs. 5,000 fine each. The court adopted a reformative sentencing approach, emphasizing that the offense arose from a spur-of-the-moment family dispute with no premeditation, the convicts had no prior convictions, and further incarceration would prejudice dependent minor children and rehabilitation prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-May-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  5. 27-Apr-2026

    Order/Argument on Sentence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  6. 18-Apr-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  7. 18-Apr-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  8. 18-Apr-2026

    Order/Argument on Sentence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  9. 30-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Additional Sessions Judge

  10. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  11. 16-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Additional Sessions Judge

  12. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  13. 09-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    Additional Sessions Judge

  14. 25-Feb-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  15. 25-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    Additional Sessions Judge

  16. 23-Feb-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  17. 23-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Additional Sessions Judge

  18. 09-Feb-2026

    Final Arguments

    Additional Sessions Judge

  19. 28-Jan-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  20. 28-Jan-2026

    Final Arguments

    Additional Sessions Judge

  21. 12-Jan-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  22. 12-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  23. 22-Dec-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  24. 22-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  25. 13-Dec-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  26. 13-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  27. 05-Dec-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  28. 05-Dec-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  29. 15-Nov-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  30. 15-Nov-2025

    Final Arguments

    Additional Sessions Judge

  31. 01-Nov-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  32. 01-Nov-2025

    Statement of Accused

    Additional Sessions Judge

  33. 29-Oct-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  34. 29-Oct-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  35. 24-Sep-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  36. 24-Sep-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  37. 28-Aug-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  38. 28-Aug-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  39. 30-Jul-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  40. 30-Jul-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  41. 30-Apr-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  42. 30-Apr-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  43. 28-Mar-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  44. 28-Mar-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  45. 08-Jan-2025

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  46. 08-Jan-2025

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  47. 03-Oct-2024

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  48. 03-Oct-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  49. 23-Sep-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  50. 01-Jul-2024

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  51. 01-Jul-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  52. 02-Apr-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  53. 22-Jan-2024

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  54. 19-Sep-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  55. 03-Aug-2023

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  56. 03-Aug-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  57. 08-Jul-2023

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  58. 08-Jul-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  59. 06-Jun-2023

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  60. 06-Jun-2023

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  61. 06-Jun-2023

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  62. 06-Jun-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  63. 16-Mar-2023

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  64. 16-Mar-2023

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  65. 16-Mar-2023

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  66. 16-Mar-2023

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  67. 16-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  68. 13-Mar-2023

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  69. 13-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  70. 09-Mar-2023

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  71. 22-Dec-2022

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  72. 22-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  73. 03-Dec-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  74. 17-Aug-2022

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  75. 08-Aug-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  76. 08-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 244/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: STATE v. ASIF (SC 244/2022) The court sentenced three convicts (Asif, Afsar Kuraishi, and Mohd Shakil) to imprisonment for the period already undergone during investigation and trial, plus Rs. 5,000 fine each. The court adopted a reformative sentencing approach, emphasizing that the offense arose from a spur-of-the-moment family dispute with no premeditation, the convicts had no prior convictions, and further incarceration would prejudice dependent minor children and rehabilitation prospects. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case