SUSHILA DEVI vs SHYAM SUNDER — 255/2025
Case under Permanent Injuction Section CPC. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 28th April 2026.
CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLNE010020722025
e-Filing Number
18-07-2025
Filing Number
1093/2025
Filing Date
19-Jul-2025
Registration No
255/2025
Registration Date
22-Jul-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD
Judge
429-District Judge
Decision Date
28-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DECREED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUSHILA DEVI
Adv. Prabhat Kiran
-
2.KAMLESH DEVI
-
3.RADHA DEVI
-
4.SUSHMA MANDAL
-
5.SARITA MANDAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.SHYAM SUNDER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
28-Apr-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
The court issued a final decree of partition for an 80 sq yard Delhi property, declaring each party entitled to 1/6th share. Since physical partition was impractical (only 3 floors for 6 stakeholders), the court ordered the property sold by auction with inter se bidding among parties, with proceeds distributed according to their shares. The defendant's request to stay proceedings pending a will-related appeal was rejected as the preliminary decree already stands. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
28-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
16-Feb-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
16-Feb-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
30-Jan-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
30-Jan-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
21-Jan-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
21-Jan-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
04-Oct-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
04-Oct-2025
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
24-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 255/2025
The court issued a final decree of partition for an 80 sq yard Delhi property, declaring each party entitled to 1/6th share. Since physical partition was impractical (only 3 floors for 6 stakeholders), the court ordered the property sold by auction with inter se bidding among parties, with proceeds distributed according to their shares. The defendant's request to stay proceedings pending a will-related appeal was rejected as the preliminary decree already stands. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts