STATE vs SUNIL KUMAR Advocate - S.G. GOSWAMI — 135/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,506. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 19th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: DLNE010010642021
Filing Number
643/2021
Filing Date
24-Feb-2021
Registration No
135/2021
Registration Date
24-Feb-2021
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD
Judge
5-Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
Decision Date
19-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
337
Police Station
Sonia Vihar
Year
2014
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.STATE
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUNIL KUMAR Advocate - S.G. GOSWAMI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
19-Mar-2026
Copy Of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Sunil Kumar (135/2021) Sunil Kumar was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 363/366/506 (kidnapping and abduction) in a case involving the alleged enticement of a 17-year-old girl in 2014. The court found that the prosecution's sole public witness—the victim's father—failed to provide incriminating testimony, the victim could not be traced despite best efforts, and remaining witnesses were merely official/formal in nature. Absent any direct or circumstantial evidence proving the essential ingredients of the alleged offences beyond reasonable doubt, the court held the prosecution had failed to meet the required standard of proof and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Mar-2026
Disposed
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Judgement
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
07-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
07-Mar-2026
Judgement
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
14-Jan-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
14-Jan-2026
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
20-Sep-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
26-Jul-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
26-Jul-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
31-May-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
31-May-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
08-Apr-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
08-Apr-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
18-Jan-2025
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
20-Sep-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
08-Jul-2024
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
08-Jul-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
02-Mar-2024
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
02-Mar-2024
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
06-Dec-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
04-Oct-2023
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
04-Oct-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
28-Mar-2023
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
28-Mar-2023
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
03-Dec-2022
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
03-Dec-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
06-Jul-2022
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
06-Jul-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
05-Mar-2022
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
05-Mar-2022
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
01-Dec-2021
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
01-Dec-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
30-Oct-2021
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
30-Oct-2021
Misc. cases
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
19-Jul-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
06-Apr-2021
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
06-Apr-2021
Prosecution Evidence
Asj/Special.judge(ndps)
-
24-Feb-2021
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
24-Feb-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 135/2021
Case Summary: State v. Sunil Kumar (135/2021) Sunil Kumar was acquitted of charges under IPC sections 363/366/506 (kidnapping and abduction) in a case involving the alleged enticement of a 17-year-old girl in 2014. The court found that the prosecution's sole public witness—the victim's father—failed to provide incriminating testimony, the victim could not be traced despite best efforts, and remaining witnesses were merely official/formal in nature. Absent any direct or circumstantial evidence proving the essential ingredients of the alleged offences beyond reasonable doubt, the court held the prosecution had failed to meet the required standard of proof and acquitted the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts