SUBODH SHARMA vs JAI PRAKASH SHARMA — 39/2025
Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section ExecutionPetition. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 12th May 2026.
EX - EXECUTION
CNR: DLNE010009992025
e-Filing Number
11-04-2025
Filing Number
586/2025
Filing Date
15-Apr-2025
Registration No
39/2025
Registration Date
24-Apr-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD
Judge
429-District Judge
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUBODH SHARMA
Adv. Sandeep Jain
Respondent(s)
-
1.JAI PRAKASH SHARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by decree holder Subodh Sharma against Jai Prakash Sharma in default, as the decree holder failed to appear despite multiple court calls and repeated opportunities. The judge concluded that the decree holder's lack of interest in pursuing execution warranted dismissal, and all pending applications were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-May-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
05-Jan-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
06-Dec-2025
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
31-Oct-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
31-Oct-2025
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
09-Sep-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
09-Sep-2025
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
11-Jul-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
11-Jul-2025
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
25-Apr-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
25-Apr-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 39/2025
The court dismissed the execution petition filed by decree holder Subodh Sharma against Jai Prakash Sharma in default, as the decree holder failed to appear despite multiple court calls and repeated opportunities. The judge concluded that the decree holder's lack of interest in pursuing execution warranted dismissal, and all pending applications were disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts