THE STATE vs ANUJ — 230/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 110,126(2),351(2). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

BAIL MATTERS

CNR: DLNE010008472026

Filing Number

394/2026

Filing Date

16-Mar-2026

Registration No

230/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD

Judge

423-Additional Sessions Judge

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

61

Police Station

Gokul Puri

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 110,126(2),351(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.ANUJ

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The court granted bail to accused Anuj under Section 483 of BNSS in a case involving alleged assault (FIR No. 61/2026, PS Gokul Puri). The court found that despite medical evidence showing injuries to complainants, the prescribed punishment under Section 110 BNS is less than 7 years, and absence of CCTV footage weakened the prosecution's case. Anuj was admitted to bail on furnishing personal and surety bonds of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, regular court appearance, and no contact with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 230/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court granted bail to accused Anuj under Section 483 of BNSS in a case involving alleged assault (FIR No. 61/2026, PS Gokul Puri). The court found that despite medical evidence showing injuries to complainants, the prescribed punishment under Section 110 BNS is less than 7 years, and absence of CCTV footage weakened the prosecution's case. Anuj was admitted to bail on furnishing personal and surety bonds of Rs. 25,000 each, subject to conditions including non-tampering with evidence, regular court appearance, and no contact with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case