STATE vs FAISAL — 54/2026

Case under Indian Arms Act 1959 Section 27,25. Status: Charge. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.

Charge Next hearing 07-Jul-2026

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: DLNE010008322026

Filing Number

386/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

54/2026

Registration Date

14-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD

Judge

423-Additional Sessions Judge

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

539

Police Station

Dayal Pur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Indian Arms Act 1959 Section 27,25
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 238(a),61(2),140(1),3(5),103(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FAISAL

Case History

  1. 07-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 13-May-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  3. 13-May-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: SC 54/2026 - STATE vs. FAISAL The court allowed the application for release of a seized I-20 Car (bearing No. DL5CW 0537) on superdari to the rightful owner, with the Investigating Officer raising no objection. The release is conditional upon proper documentation including an indemnity bond, punchnama, photographs from multiple angles with signatures, and filing these with the final report. A separate application for CCTV footage supply is pending reply from the IO. The case is adjourned to 07.07.2026 for arguments on both the application and charge framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 13-May-2026

    Charge

    Additional Sessions Judge

  5. 18-Apr-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  6. 18-Apr-2026

    Charge

    Additional Sessions Judge

  7. 14-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SC 54/2026 - STATE vs. FAISAL The court allowed the application for release of a seized I-20 Car (bearing No. DL5CW 0537) on superdari to the rightful owner, with the Investigating Officer raising no objection. The release is conditional upon proper documentation including an indemnity bond, punchnama, photographs from multiple angles with signatures, and filing these with the final report. A separate application for CCTV footage supply is pending reply from the IO. The case is adjourned to 07.07.2026 for arguments on both the application and charge framing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case