ALOK VERMA vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI — 213/2026
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,406,409. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 16th March 2026.
BAIL MATTERS
CNR: DLNE010007852026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
361/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
213/2026
Registration Date
10-Mar-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD
Judge
423-Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
8
Police Station
EOW
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ALOK VERMA
Adv. ABHINAV RAMKRISHNA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Alok Verma v. State of NCT of Delhi (213/2026) The court dismissed Alok Verma's bail application in a cooperative society fraud case involving approximately ₹8.9 crores siphoned from ~200 investors. Despite Verma's claims that he resigned in 2023 and didn't sign cheques, the court found credible evidence of his active involvement: FDRs bore his signature, complainants testified they met him post-2023 regarding deposits, and ₹6.75 lacs were unlawfully withdrawn from society accounts. The court also granted police custody and noted the scheme violated cooperative by-laws by over-lending without security, causing massive defaults. The judgment emphasized that large-scale financial fraud eroding investor confidence cannot be treated leniently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional Sessions Judge
-
11-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 213/2026
Case Summary: Alok Verma v. State of NCT of Delhi (213/2026) The court dismissed Alok Verma's bail application in a cooperative society fraud case involving approximately ₹8.9 crores siphoned from ~200 investors. Despite Verma's claims that he resigned in 2023 and didn't sign cheques, the court found credible evidence of his active involvement: FDRs bore his signature, complainants testified they met him post-2023 regarding deposits, and ₹6.75 lacs were unlawfully withdrawn from society accounts. The court also granted police custody and noted the scheme violated cooperative by-laws by over-lending without security, causing massive defaults. The judgment emphasized that large-scale financial fraud eroding investor confidence cannot be treated leniently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts