SHARUKH KHAN vs STATE THROUGH SHO PS DAYALPUR — 30/2026
Case under Indian Arms Act 1959 Section 25. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 18th March 2026.
Cr Rev - CRIMINAL REVISION
CNR: DLNE010007572026
e-Filing Number
07-03-2026
Filing Number
339/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
30/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD
Judge
423-Additional Sessions Judge
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
FIR Details
FIR Number
67
Police Station
Dayal Pur
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHARUKH KHAN
Adv. Anirudh Ramanathan
Respondent(s)
STATE THROUGH SHO (Station House Officer) PS (Police Station) DAYALPUR
Hearing History
Judge: 423-Additional Sessions Judge
Disposed
Misc./ Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Misc./ Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sharukh Khan v. State (30/2026) The court dismissed Sharukh Khan's revision petition challenging the charge framing order under Section 25 of the Arms Act. Though Khan alleged illegal detention (24-28 February 2020), lack of public witnesses, absence of fingerprint evidence, and custodial torture, the court held these are matters for trial and found no patent illegality in the trial court's charging order. The court upheld the charge, noting police witnesses and recovery of a firearm on 27 February 2020 constitute sufficient grounds for proceeding to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Sharukh Khan v. State (30/2026) The court dismissed Sharukh Khan's revision petition challenging the charge framing order under Section 25 of the Arms Act. Though Khan alleged illegal detention (24-28 February 2020), lack of public witnesses, absence of fingerprint evidence, and custodial torture, the court held these are matters for trial and found no patent illegality in the trial court's charging order. The court upheld the charge, noting police witnesses and recovery of a firearm on 27 February 2020 constitute sufficient grounds for proceeding to trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts