Mukul Rajora vs state — 187/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section bail. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 18th March 2026.

Case disposed

BAIL MATTERS

CNR: DLNE010007292026

e-Filing Number

28-02-2026

Filing Number

325/2026

Filing Date

28-Feb-2026

Registration No

187/2026

Registration Date

28-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD

Judge

5-Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

Decision Date

18-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section bail

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mukul Rajora

    Adv. RABINDRA SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed Mukul Rajora's anticipatory bail application in an NDPS case involving commercial quantities of controlled drugs (Tramadol capsules and Codeine syrup) recovered from his brother's possession. The court found that Section 37 of the NDPS Act's bar on bail applied since commercial quantity contraband was involved, and Rajora had absconded despite investigation notices and issued non-bailable warrants, with proceedings already initiated under Section 84 BNSS against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  6. 14-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  9. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 28-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 187/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed Mukul Rajora's anticipatory bail application in an NDPS case involving commercial quantities of controlled drugs (Tramadol capsules and Codeine syrup) recovered from his brother's possession. The court found that Section 37 of the NDPS Act's bar on bail applied since commercial quantity contraband was involved, and Rajora had absconded despite investigation notices and issued non-bailable warrants, with proceedings already initiated under Section 84 BNSS against him. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case