THE STATE vs MONU KUMAR — 168/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 308,318(4),319,340. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

BAIL MATTERS

CNR: DLNE010006552026

Filing Number

295/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

168/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD

Judge

5-Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

17

Police Station

Cyber Cell

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 308,318(4),319,340

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MONU KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: The State v. Monu Kumar (168/2026) The court dismissed Monu Kumar's bail application in a cyber fraud case involving Rs. 31,45,000 swindled through fake online investment schemes. The judge found prima facie evidence of Kumar's involvement based on incriminating chats recovered from his mobile phone and disclosure statements corroborating co-accused involvement, rejecting arguments of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    For Bail

    Asj/Special.judge(ndps)

  8. 26-Feb-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  9. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 168/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The State v. Monu Kumar (168/2026) The court dismissed Monu Kumar's bail application in a cyber fraud case involving Rs. 31,45,000 swindled through fake online investment schemes. The judge found prima facie evidence of Kumar's involvement based on incriminating chats recovered from his mobile phone and disclosure statements corroborating co-accused involvement, rejecting arguments of false implication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case