NASEEM MALIK (THR. SPA) vs THE BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD — 100/2025
Case under Suit for Declaration Section 32. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT on 24th April 2026.
CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLNE010006452025
e-Filing Number
03-03-2025
Filing Number
381/2025
Filing Date
04-Mar-2025
Registration No
100/2025
Registration Date
10-Mar-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD
Judge
429-District Judge
Decision Date
24-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED IN DEFAULT
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NASEEM MALIK (THR. SPA)
Adv. AKASH RUHELA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Apr-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
The suit filed by Naseem Malik (through Special Power of Attorney) against BSES Yamuna Power Ltd was dismissed in default on 24.04.2026. The court found that the plaintiff failed to appear despite multiple opportunities, did not pay the required court cost, and failed to place the original GPA dated 20.08.2020 on record, demonstrating lack of interest in prosecuting the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
Disposed
District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
17-Mar-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
05-Jan-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
05-Jan-2026
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
04-Nov-2025
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
29-Aug-2025
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
06-Jun-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
06-Jun-2025
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
20-Mar-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
20-Mar-2025
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
12-Mar-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
12-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 100/2025
The suit filed by Naseem Malik (through Special Power of Attorney) against BSES Yamuna Power Ltd was dismissed in default on 24.04.2026. The court found that the plaintiff failed to appear despite multiple opportunities, did not pay the required court cost, and failed to place the original GPA dated 20.08.2020 on record, demonstrating lack of interest in prosecuting the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts