PINKI vs PARVESH KUMAR — 82/2026

Case under Suit for Declaration Section 151. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 23rd May 2026.

Case disposed

MISC DJ - MISC. CASES FOR DJ ADJ

CNR: DLNE010004392026

e-Filing Number

07-02-2026

Filing Number

249/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

82/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD

Judge

429-District Judge

Decision Date

23-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Suit for Declaration Section 151

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PINKI

    Adv. Himanshu Detwal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PARVESH KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-May-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Summary In MISC DJ 82/2026, the court dismissed Parvesh Kumar's application seeking to set aside an ex-parte judgment and decree dated 07.08.2024 in a specific performance suit filed by Pinki. The court found that Kumar's claim of non-service was false, having established through documentary evidence (affidavits from prior litigation CS No. 90/2020) that he continuously resided at the same Delhi address from 2020-2025, contradicting his assertion of renting in Noida during 2020-2023. The court concluded Kumar deliberately avoided service and was aware of the litigation, making his application misconceived and dismissing it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Misc./ Arguments

    District Judge

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  7. 13-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases

    District Judge

  8. 13-Feb-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  9. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 82/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In MISC DJ 82/2026, the court dismissed Parvesh Kumar's application seeking to set aside an ex-parte judgment and decree dated 07.08.2024 in a specific performance suit filed by Pinki. The court found that Kumar's claim of non-service was false, having established through documentary evidence (affidavits from prior litigation CS No. 90/2020) that he continuously resided at the same Delhi address from 2020-2025, contradicting his assertion of renting in Noida during 2020-2023. The court concluded Kumar deliberately avoided service and was aware of the litigation, making his application misconceived and dismissing it. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case