Shri Attar Singh vs Lalit Sharma — 3/2026

Case under Suit for Declaration Section 24. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

T. P. Civil - Transfer Petition Civil

CNR: DLNE010004162026

e-Filing Number

05-02-2026

Filing Number

238/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD

Judge

413-Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Suit for Declaration Section 24

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shri Attar Singh

    Adv. Kamlesh Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Lalit Sharma

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: Shri Attar Singh v. Lalit Sharma (3/2026) The court dismissed a transfer application filed by Attar Singh, who alleged the Trial Court delayed deciding a pending execution case (since 2018) and related applications for arrest and property attachment. The court found these allegations vexatious and unsupported by record, noting ₹14 lakhs had already been paid toward the ₹28 lakh debt. The applicant was ordered to pay ₹5,000 in costs, and the Trial Court was directed to decide pending applications within one week per High Court directions from August 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Misc. cases

    Principal District and Sessions Judge - North-East District

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Shri Attar Singh v. Lalit Sharma (3/2026) The court dismissed a transfer application filed by Attar Singh, who alleged the Trial Court delayed deciding a pending execution case (since 2018) and related applications for arrest and property attachment. The court found these allegations vexatious and unsupported by record, noting ₹14 lakhs had already been paid toward the ₹28 lakh debt. The applicant was ordered to pay ₹5,000 in costs, and the Trial Court was directed to decide pending applications within one week per High Court directions from August 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case