DEEPAK TRIWEDI vs ASHOK SHARMA AND ORS. — 27/2022
Case under Declaration and Mandatory Injuction Section CIVIL,PROCEDURE,CODE. Status: Defendant/Respondent Evidence. Next hearing: 01st July 2026.
CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ ADJ
CNR: DLNE010002152022
e-Filing Number
25-01-2022
Filing Number
92/2022
Filing Date
25-Jan-2022
Registration No
27/2022
Registration Date
08-Feb-2022
Court
District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD
Judge
429-District Judge
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.DEEPAK TRIWEDI
Adv. RAHUL LAL AKHRIYA
Respondent(s)
-
1.ASHOK SHARMA AND ORS.
-
2.RITA SHARMA
-
3.SHUBHAM
-
4.MANISHA
-
5.PRAVEEN MISHRA
Case History
-
01-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
30-Mar-2026
Copy Of Order
Case Summary (CS 27/22): The court declined the plaintiff's request to examine two additional witnesses—Padmesh Kumar Dixit and Durgesh Shukla. The court found that Dixit's testimony regarding tenancy was not pleaded in the suit for declaration of title, and Shukla's examination lacked clear relevancy or proper pleading basis. Plaintiff's examination (PE) was closed, and the case is listed for defendant's examination on 01-02 July 2026, with defendant's witness affidavits due 15 days prior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Defendant/Respondent Evidence
District Judge
-
17-Mar-2026
Copy Of Order
-
17-Mar-2026
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
18-Nov-2025
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
19-Aug-2025
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
20-May-2025
Copy Of Order
-
20-May-2025
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
19-May-2025
Copy Of Order
-
19-May-2025
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
04-Mar-2025
Copy Of Order
-
04-Mar-2025
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
10-Dec-2024
Copy Of Order
-
10-Dec-2024
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
01-Oct-2024
Copy Of Order
-
01-Oct-2024
Plaintiff/Petitioner Evidence
District Judge
-
20-Aug-2024
Copy Of Order
-
20-Aug-2024
Misc. Arguments
District Judge
-
15-Jul-2024
Copy Of Order
-
15-Jul-2024
Misc. Arguments
District Judge
-
20-May-2024
Copy Of Order
-
20-May-2024
Misc. Arguments
District Judge
-
11-Mar-2024
Copy Of Order
-
11-Mar-2024
Misc. Arguments
District Judge
-
01-Feb-2024
Copy Of Order
-
01-Feb-2024
Issues
District Judge
-
01-Dec-2023
Copy Of Order
-
01-Dec-2023
Issues
District Judge
-
10-Oct-2023
Copy Of Order
-
10-Oct-2023
Misc. Arguments
District Judge
-
02-Aug-2023
Copy Of Order
-
02-Aug-2023
Misc. Arguments
District Judge
-
26-May-2023
Copy Of Order
-
26-May-2023
Misc. Arguments
District Judge
-
28-Mar-2023
Copy Of Order
-
28-Mar-2023
Misc. Arguments
District Judge
-
21-Jan-2023
Copy Of Order
-
21-Jan-2023
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
10-Jan-2023
Copy Of Order
-
10-Jan-2023
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
01-Oct-2022
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
30-Aug-2022
Copy Of Order
-
30-Aug-2022
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
07-Jun-2022
Copy Of Order
-
07-Jun-2022
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
23-Apr-2022
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
03-Mar-2022
Copy Of Order
-
03-Mar-2022
Copy Of Order
-
03-Mar-2022
Misc. cases
District Judge
-
11-Feb-2022
Copy Of Order
-
11-Feb-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jan-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 27/2022
Case Summary (CS 27/22): The court declined the plaintiff's request to examine two additional witnesses—Padmesh Kumar Dixit and Durgesh Shukla. The court found that Dixit's testimony regarding tenancy was not pleaded in the suit for declaration of title, and Shukla's examination lacked clear relevancy or proper pleading basis. Plaintiff's examination (PE) was closed, and the case is listed for defendant's examination on 01-02 July 2026, with defendant's witness affidavits due 15 days prior. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts