STATE vs KHALID — 17/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),238(b),3(5). Status: Prosecution Evidence. Next hearing: 21st July 2026.

Prosecution Evidence Next hearing 21-Jul-2026

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: DLNE010001652026

Filing Number

92/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

17/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge, North-East, KKD

Judge

423-Additional Sessions Judge

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

398

Police Station

Dayal Pur

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 109(1),238(b),3(5)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KHALID

  2. 2.SALMAN ALIAS BALLU

  3. 3.MOHD ASIF ALIAS GUDDU

  4. 4.MOHD AMIR

Case History

  1. 21-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: STATE v. KHALID (SC 17/2026) Charges were framed against both accused (Khalid, Salman alias Ballu, and Mohd Asif alias Guddu) under Section 109(1)/3(5) NBS, which they pleaded not guilty to and claimed trial. Accused Khalid was permitted to appear via video conference for future proceedings due to safety concerns in jail, after his counsel consented. The case was adjourned for prosecution evidence (PE) on 21.07.2026, with complainant Naushad and key witnesses to be summoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-Apr-2026

    Prosecution Evidence

    Additional Sessions Judge

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Charge

    Additional Sessions Judge

  5. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    Charge

    Additional Sessions Judge

  7. 19-Feb-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  8. 19-Feb-2026

    Charge

    Additional Sessions Judge

  9. 17-Jan-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  10. 17-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  11. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: STATE v. KHALID (SC 17/2026) Charges were framed against both accused (Khalid, Salman alias Ballu, and Mohd Asif alias Guddu) under Section 109(1)/3(5) NBS, which they pleaded not guilty to and claimed trial. Accused Khalid was permitted to appear via video conference for future proceedings due to safety concerns in jail, after his counsel consented. The case was adjourned for prosecution evidence (PE) on 21.07.2026, with complainant Naushad and key witnesses to be summoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case