SWATI CHATURVEDI vs M/S AADHYAASI MEDIA AND CONTENT SERVICES PVT LTD — 892/2019
Case under Declaration and Mandatory Injuction Section 75. Status: Order. Next hearing: 10th September 2026.
CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ
CNR: DLND010234772019
Filing Number
19128/2019
Filing Date
13-Dec-2019
Registration No
892/2019
Registration Date
16-Dec-2019
Court
District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC
Judge
13-District Judge-03
Last updated 12-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SWATI CHATURVEDI
Adv. V K OHRI
Respondent(s)
-
1.M/S AADHYAASI MEDIA AND CONTENT SERVICES PVT LTD
-
2.OPINDIA.COM
-
3.NUPUR JHUNJHUNWALA SHARMA
-
4.ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA
-
5.SHAILI ANIL KUMAR RAVAL
-
6.GODADDY INDIA WEB SERVICES P. LTD.
Case History
-
10-Sep-2026
Next hearingPending
-
13-May-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
13-May-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
Case Summary: Swati Chaturvedi v. M/s Aadhyaasi Media and Content Services Pvt. Ltd. (CS 892/19) The Delhi District Court granted interim injunction in favor of journalist Swati Chaturvedi in her defamation suit. The court directed defendants to block/remove two defamatory articles (dated 02.06.2018 and 08.05.2019) from www.opindia.com during suit pendency and prohibited publication of any further defamatory articles about the plaintiff. The court found the plaintiff would suffer irreparable reputational harm if articles remained publicly accessible, while removal causes no prejudice to defendants' freedom of speech since they can prove their defense at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-May-2026
Order
District Judge-03
-
11-May-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
11-May-2026
Order
District Judge-03
-
07-Apr-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
07-Apr-2026
Order
District Judge-03
-
23-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-03
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Order
District Judge-03
-
17-Nov-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
17-Nov-2025
Misc. Arguments
District Judge-03
-
11-Aug-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
11-Aug-2025
Misc. Arguments
District Judge-03
-
19-Jul-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
19-Jul-2025
Misc. Arguments
District Judge-03
-
24-Apr-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
24-Apr-2025
Misc. Arguments
District Judge-03
-
23-Jan-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
23-Jan-2025
Misc. Arguments
District Judge-03
-
13-Aug-2024
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
13-Aug-2024
Misc. Arguments
District Judge-03
-
13-Aug-2024
Issues
District Judge-03
-
05-Feb-2024
Issues
District Judge-03
-
22-Aug-2023
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
22-Aug-2023
Issues
-
02-Mar-2023
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
02-Mar-2023
Issues
-
06-Jan-2023
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
06-Jan-2023
Issues
-
05-Aug-2022
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
05-Aug-2022
Misc. Arguments
-
24-Jan-2022
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
24-Jan-2022
Misc. Arguments
-
09-Sep-2021
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
09-Sep-2021
Misc. Arguments
-
16-Apr-2021
Misc. Arguments
-
18-Mar-2021
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
18-Mar-2021
Misc. Arguments
-
06-Nov-2020
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
06-Nov-2020
Misc. cases
-
07-Sep-2020
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
07-Sep-2020
Misc. cases
-
13-Jul-2020
Misc. cases
-
06-Mar-2020
Misc. cases
-
16-Dec-2019
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
16-Dec-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Dec-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 892/2019
Case Summary: Swati Chaturvedi v. M/s Aadhyaasi Media and Content Services Pvt. Ltd. (CS 892/19) The Delhi District Court granted interim injunction in favor of journalist Swati Chaturvedi in her defamation suit. The court directed defendants to block/remove two defamatory articles (dated 02.06.2018 and 08.05.2019) from www.opindia.com during suit pendency and prohibited publication of any further defamatory articles about the plaintiff. The court found the plaintiff would suffer irreparable reputational harm if articles remained publicly accessible, while removal causes no prejudice to defendants' freedom of speech since they can prove their defense at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts