SWATI CHATURVEDI vs M/S AADHYAASI MEDIA AND CONTENT SERVICES PVT LTD — 892/2019
Case under Declaration and Mandatory Injuction Section 75. Status: Order. Next hearing: 10th September 2026.
CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ
CNR: DLND010234772019
Next Hearing
10th September 2026
Filing Number
19128/2019
Filing Date
13-12-2019
Registration No
892/2019
Registration Date
16-12-2019
Court
District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC
Judge
13-District Judge-03
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SWATI CHATURVEDI
Adv. V K OHRI
Respondent(s)
M/S AADHYAASI MEDIA AND CONTENT SERVICES PVT LTD
OPINDIA.COM
NUPUR JHUNJHUNWALA SHARMA
ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA
SHAILI ANIL KUMAR RAVAL
GODADDY INDIA WEB SERVICES P. LTD.
Hearing History
Judge: 13-District Judge-03
Order
Order
Order
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-05-2026 | Order |
| 11-05-2026 | Order |
| 07-04-2026 | Order |
| 23-03-2026 | Order |
| 16-03-2026 | Order |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Swati Chaturvedi v. M/s Aadhyaasi Media and Content Services Pvt. Ltd. (CS 892/19) The Delhi District Court granted interim injunction in favor of journalist Swati Chaturvedi in her defamation suit. The court directed defendants to block/remove two defamatory articles (dated 02.06.2018 and 08.05.2019) from www.opindia.com during suit pendency and prohibited publication of any further defamatory articles about the plaintiff. The court found the plaintiff would suffer irreparable reputational harm if articles remained publicly accessible, while removal causes no prejudice to defendants' freedom of speech since they can prove their defense at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Swati Chaturvedi v. M/s Aadhyaasi Media and Content Services Pvt. Ltd. (CS 892/19) The Delhi District Court granted interim injunction in favor of journalist Swati Chaturvedi in her defamation suit. The court directed defendants to block/remove two defamatory articles (dated 02.06.2018 and 08.05.2019) from www.opindia.com during suit pendency and prohibited publication of any further defamatory articles about the plaintiff. The court found the plaintiff would suffer irreparable reputational harm if articles remained publicly accessible, while removal causes no prejudice to defendants' freedom of speech since they can prove their defense at trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts