PRAKASH BROTHERS vs KAPOOR BOOK AND STATIONARY COMPANY PVT LTD AND ORS — 1155/2018
Case under Civil Cases Section 37. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ
CNR: DLND010149692018
Next Hearing
15th July 2026
Filing Number
11007/2018
Filing Date
07-12-2018
Registration No
1155/2018
Registration Date
10-12-2018
Court
District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC
Judge
13-District Judge-03
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PRAKASH BROTHERS
Adv. V K TANDAN
Respondent(s)
KAPOOR BOOK AND STATIONARY COMPANY PVT LTD AND ORS
Hearing History
Judge: 13-District Judge-03
Issues
Order
Misc. Arguments
Order
Misc. Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Issues |
| 13-03-2026 | Order |
| 19-02-2026 | Misc. Arguments |
| 29-01-2026 | Order |
| 23-09-2025 | Misc. Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Prakash Brothers v. Kapoor Book and Stationary Company Pvt Ltd (CS 1155/18) Outcome: The defendant's application to dismiss the suit under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was dismissed/not allowed. Key Points: Prakash Brothers (unregistered partnership) sued Kapoor Book and Stationary Company for Rs. 5,77,585/- owed for book supplies and a dishonoured cheque. The defendant argued the suit was barred under Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, which prohibits unregistered firms from suing on contractual obligations. The court held that claims arising from cheque dishonour constitute statutory liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act (Sections 30 & 37), not contractual claims, and therefore are not barred by Section 69. The suit was permitted to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Prakash Brothers v. Kapoor Book and Stationary Company Pvt Ltd (CS 1155/18) Outcome: The defendant's application to dismiss the suit under Order VII Rule 11 CPC was dismissed/not allowed. Key Points: Prakash Brothers (unregistered partnership) sued Kapoor Book and Stationary Company for Rs. 5,77,585/- owed for book supplies and a dishonoured cheque. The defendant argued the suit was barred under Section 69 of the Indian Partnership Act, 1932, which prohibits unregistered firms from suing on contractual obligations. The court held that claims arising from cheque dishonour constitute statutory liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act (Sections 30 & 37), not contractual claims, and therefore are not barred by Section 69. The suit was permitted to proceed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts