NASRUDDIN ANSARI vs MODH. ASRAF ANSARI — 444/2019
Case under Recovery of Money Section 37. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.
CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ
CNR: DLND010095662019
Next Hearing
27th July 2026
Filing Number
7694/2019
Filing Date
29-05-2019
Registration No
444/2019
Registration Date
30-05-2019
Court
District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC
Judge
13-District Judge-03
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NASRUDDIN ANSARI
Adv. JAIPAL SINGH
Respondent(s)
MODH. ASRAF ANSARI
Hearing History
Judge: 13-District Judge-03
Issues
Order
Misc. Arguments
Misc. Arguments
Misc. Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Issues |
| 16-03-2026 | Order |
| 10-11-2025 | Misc. Arguments |
| 30-05-2025 | Misc. Arguments |
| 20-01-2025 | Misc. Arguments |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CS 444/2019 The defendant's application for leave to defend under Order 37 Rule 3(4) CPC was allowed. The plaintiff sought recovery of Rs. 7,50,000 as loan with 18% interest, claiming the defendant received multiple disbursements with signed agreements. The defendant contested, claiming he received only Rs. 1,00,000 (already repaid via 24 installments) and alleged he was fraudulently made to sign blank papers while illiterate. The court found triable issues existed, particularly regarding the discrepancy between loan agreement dates and disbursement dates, necessitating evidence. The defendant was directed to file a written statement within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CS 444/2019 The defendant's application for leave to defend under Order 37 Rule 3(4) CPC was allowed. The plaintiff sought recovery of Rs. 7,50,000 as loan with 18% interest, claiming the defendant received multiple disbursements with signed agreements. The defendant contested, claiming he received only Rs. 1,00,000 (already repaid via 24 installments) and alleged he was fraudulently made to sign blank papers while illiterate. The court found triable issues existed, particularly regarding the discrepancy between loan agreement dates and disbursement dates, necessitating evidence. The defendant was directed to file a written statement within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts