NASRUDDIN ANSARI vs MODH. ASRAF ANSARI — 444/2019

Case under Recovery of Money Section 37. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 27th July 2026.

Issues Next hearing 27-Jul-2026 this date has passed

CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ

CNR: DLND010095662019

Filing Number

7694/2019

Filing Date

29-May-2019

Registration No

444/2019

Registration Date

30-May-2019

Court

District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC

Judge

13-District Judge-03

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Recovery of Money Section 37

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NASRUDDIN ANSARI

    Adv. JAIPAL SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MODH. ASRAF ANSARI

Case History

  1. 27-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: CS 444/2019 The defendant's application for leave to defend under Order 37 Rule 3(4) CPC was allowed. The plaintiff sought recovery of Rs. 7,50,000 as loan with 18% interest, claiming the defendant received multiple disbursements with signed agreements. The defendant contested, claiming he received only Rs. 1,00,000 (already repaid via 24 installments) and alleged he was fraudulently made to sign blank papers while illiterate. The court found triable issues existed, particularly regarding the discrepancy between loan agreement dates and disbursement dates, necessitating evidence. The defendant was directed to file a written statement within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Issues

    District Judge-03

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  6. 16-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge-03

  7. 10-Nov-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  8. 10-Nov-2025

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge-03

  9. 30-May-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  10. 30-May-2025

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge-03

  11. 20-Jan-2025

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  12. 20-Jan-2025

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge-03

  13. 01-Oct-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  14. 01-Oct-2024

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge-03

  15. 15-May-2024

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  16. 15-May-2024

    Misc. Arguments

    District Judge-03

  17. 22-Dec-2023

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  18. 22-Dec-2023

    Issues

    District Judge-03

  19. 24-Nov-2023

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  20. 24-Nov-2023

    Issues

  21. 22-Jul-2023

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  22. 22-Jul-2023

    Issues

  23. 01-Mar-2023

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  24. 01-Mar-2023

    Misc. cases

  25. 11-Nov-2022

    Misc. cases

  26. 26-Jul-2022

    Misc. cases

  27. 13-Jan-2022

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  28. 13-Jan-2022

    Misc. cases

  29. 12-Aug-2021

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  30. 12-Aug-2021

    Misc. cases

  31. 07-Apr-2021

    Misc. cases

  32. 09-Dec-2020

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  33. 09-Dec-2020

    Misc. cases

  34. 10-Aug-2020

    Misc. cases

  35. 17-Jun-2020

    Misc. cases

  36. 24-Apr-2020

    Misc. cases

  37. 24-Mar-2020

    Misc. cases

  38. 22-Feb-2020

    Misc. cases

  39. 18-Nov-2019

    Misc. cases

  40. 30-May-2019

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

  41. 30-May-2019

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 29-May-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. 444/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CS 444/2019 The defendant's application for leave to defend under Order 37 Rule 3(4) CPC was allowed. The plaintiff sought recovery of Rs. 7,50,000 as loan with 18% interest, claiming the defendant received multiple disbursements with signed agreements. The defendant contested, claiming he received only Rs. 1,00,000 (already repaid via 24 installments) and alleged he was fraudulently made to sign blank papers while illiterate. The court found triable issues existed, particularly regarding the discrepancy between loan agreement dates and disbursement dates, necessitating evidence. The defendant was directed to file a written statement within 30 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case