USHA DEVI AND ORS vs SANDHYA JOSHI AND ORS — 297/2019

Case under Civil Cases Section 136. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 05th August 2026.

CS - CIVIL SUIT FOR DJ and ADJ

CNR: DLND010061742019

Issues

Next Hearing

05th August 2026

Filing Number

4991/2019

Filing Date

01-04-2019

Registration No

297/2019

Registration Date

02-04-2019

Court

District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC

Judge

13-District Judge-03

Acts & Sections

Civil Cases Section 136

Petitioner(s)

USHA DEVI AND ORS

Adv. S K PANDEY

Respondent(s)

SANDHYA JOSHI AND ORS

MS SHAIL TRIPATHI RES NO 02

Hearing History

Judge: 13-District Judge-03

13-03-2026

Issues

12-03-2026

Order

06-11-2025

Misc. Arguments

03-06-2025

Misc. Arguments

21-01-2025

Misc. Arguments

Interim Orders

02-04-2019
COPY OF ORDER
28-08-2019
COPY OF ORDER
17-02-2020
COPY OF ORDER
20-04-2022
COPY OF ORDER
23-09-2022
COPY OF ORDER
13-04-2023
COPY OF ORDER
03-06-2025
COPY OF ORDER
13-03-2026
COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Summary of Case 297/2019 The District Court rejected Defendant No.1's application challenging the maintainability of the suit on res judicata grounds. The court found that while a previous suit (CS 56849/16) addressed only the second floor of property B-25, Vasant Kunj Enclave, the present suit seeks declaration and possession of the entire property. The court held that whether res judicata applies is a matter for trial and requires evidence, thus cannot be decided at the preliminary stage. Application dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 297/2019 The District Court rejected Defendant No.1's application challenging the maintainability of the suit on res judicata grounds. The court found that while a previous suit (CS 56849/16) addressed only the second floor of property B-25, Vasant Kunj Enclave, the present suit seeks declaration and possession of the entire property. The court held that whether res judicata applies is a matter for trial and requires evidence, thus cannot be decided at the preliminary stage. Application dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case