STATE OF DELHI vs DEEPAK GUPTA — 547/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Matters - Bail Case Type

CNR: DLND010026832026

Filing Number

990/2026

Filing Date

14-Mar-2026

Registration No

547/2026

Registration Date

14-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC

Judge

10-Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

233

Police Station

Delhi Cantt.

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF DELHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEEPAK GUPTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Copy Of OrderView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Delhi v. Deepak Gupta (547/2026) The court granted regular bail to Deepak Gupta, accused in a dacoity case, finding that investigation was complete, charge sheet filed, and the prosecution's evidence (recovered mobile phone, CCTV footage, and CDR records) insufficient without corroborating details. The court held that continued custody served no purpose given the accused's clean antecedents, over 2 months detention, and willingness to comply with bail conditions. Bail was granted at Rs. 50,000 with surety and conditions including non-contact with witnesses, court appearance, and cooperation with further investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  4. 19-Mar-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 14-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 547/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Delhi v. Deepak Gupta (547/2026) The court granted regular bail to Deepak Gupta, accused in a dacoity case, finding that investigation was complete, charge sheet filed, and the prosecution's evidence (recovered mobile phone, CCTV footage, and CDR records) insufficient without corroborating details. The court held that continued custody served no purpose given the accused's clean antecedents, over 2 months detention, and willingness to comply with bail conditions. Bail was granted at Rs. 50,000 with surety and conditions including non-contact with witnesses, court appearance, and cooperation with further investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case