STATE OF DELHI vs VISHNU SINGH — 469/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 17th March 2026.

Case disposed

Bail Matters - Bail Case Type

CNR: DLND010023752026

Filing Number

858/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

469/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC

Judge

10-Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

Decision Date

17-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

02

Police Station

Vasant Kunj North

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 482

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF DELHI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VISHNU SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Order

    Case 469/2026 Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Vishnu Singh under Section 482 BNSS. The court found that while the IO opposed bail citing lack of cooperation, the IO himself admitted there was no need for custody, no evidence connecting the accused to any recovery, and that CDR records merely showed business-related conversations with a co-accused that were non-incriminating. With no previous criminal record and only a co-accused's disclosure statement against him, Singh was admitted to bail on a Rs. 50,000 bond with conditions including reporting restrictions and investigation cooperation requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Order

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Misc./ Appearance

    Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Order

  7. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 469/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 469/2026 Summary: The court granted anticipatory bail to accused Vishnu Singh under Section 482 BNSS. The court found that while the IO opposed bail citing lack of cooperation, the IO himself admitted there was no need for custody, no evidence connecting the accused to any recovery, and that CDR records merely showed business-related conversations with a co-accused that were non-incriminating. With no previous criminal record and only a co-accused's disclosure statement against him, Singh was admitted to bail on a Rs. 50,000 bond with conditions including reporting restrictions and investigation cooperation requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case