Shishpal Yadav vs Avinash Puri and Ors — 12/2026

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.

T P (C) - TransferApplication

CNR: DLND010021042026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

22-02-2026

Filing Number

1392/2026

Filing Date

24-02-2026

Registration No

12/2026

Registration Date

26-02-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 24

Petitioner(s)

Shishpal Yadav

Adv. JAI WADHWA

Respondent(s)

Avinash Puri and Ors

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

30-03-2026

Disposed

28-03-2026

Misc./ Appearance

13-03-2026

Misc./ Appearance

26-02-2026

Misc./ Appearance

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
COPY OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS

Case Summary: Shishpal Yadav v. Avinash Puri and Ors. (TP(C) No. 12/2026) The court granted the petitioner's transfer petition under Section 24 CPC, allowing transfer of Civil Appeal RCA DJ/8/2026 from Ms. Meenu Kaushik (DJ-03) to Dr. Pankaj Sharma (DJ-02, Waqf Tribunal), both at Patiala House Court, New Delhi. The transfer was ordered because a connected appeal (CS SCJ.628/25) involving the same parties and arising from the same underlying order was already pending before Dr. Sharma's court, and consolidating both appeals before the same judge was deemed expedient and in the interest of justice. The respondent counsel offered no opposition to the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Shishpal Yadav v. Avinash Puri and Ors. (TP(C) No. 12/2026) The court granted the petitioner's transfer petition under Section 24 CPC, allowing transfer of Civil Appeal RCA DJ/8/2026 from Ms. Meenu Kaushik (DJ-03) to Dr. Pankaj Sharma (DJ-02, Waqf Tribunal), both at Patiala House Court, New Delhi. The transfer was ordered because a connected appeal (CS SCJ.628/25) involving the same parties and arising from the same underlying order was already pending before Dr. Sharma's court, and consolidating both appeals before the same judge was deemed expedient and in the interest of justice. The respondent counsel offered no opposition to the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case