POONAM KUMARI vs GOPAL DASS ALIAS BILLU AND ORS. — 20/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

T P (CRL) - Transfer Application(CRL)

CNR: DLND010018972026

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

678/2026

Filing Date

19-Feb-2026

Registration No

20/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC

Judge

1-Principal District and Sessions Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

8888888

Police Station

Inder Puri

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 448

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.POONAM KUMARI

    Adv. MANISH PANCHAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOPAL DASS ALIAS BILLU AND ORS.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

    Summary of Case 20/2026 (Poonam Kumari v. Gopal Dass & Ors.): The Principal District & Sessions Judge dismissed petitioner Poonam Kumari's application to transfer the complaint case to POCSO Court, finding that while Section 6 of POCSO Act was mentioned in the complaint title, no actual allegations of this offense were made in the complaint itself. The case, involving charges under IPC Sections 323/341/354-A/506/509/34, was remitted to the trial court (JMFC-4) to proceed with hearing in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal District and Sessions Judge

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 20/2026 (Poonam Kumari v. Gopal Dass & Ors.): The Principal District & Sessions Judge dismissed petitioner Poonam Kumari's application to transfer the complaint case to POCSO Court, finding that while Section 6 of POCSO Act was mentioned in the complaint title, no actual allegations of this offense were made in the complaint itself. The case, involving charges under IPC Sections 323/341/354-A/506/509/34, was remitted to the trial court (JMFC-4) to proceed with hearing in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case