MANOJ PUNDIR vs SUN ROSE TRADING PVT. LTD. — 90/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 14th March 2026.
CA - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: DLND010018102025
e-Filing Number
11-03-2025
Filing Number
724/2025
Filing Date
12-Mar-2025
Registration No
90/2025
Registration Date
26-Mar-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC
Judge
10-Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 07-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANOJ PUNDIR
Respondent(s)
-
1.SUN ROSE TRADING PVT. LTD.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy Of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Manoj Pundir v. Sun Rose Trading Pvt. Ltd. (CA 90/2025) The appellate court acquitted Manoj Pundir of cheque dishonor charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, overturning the trial court's conviction and ₹22 lakh fine. The court found that statutory presumptions favoring the complainant were rebutted because: (1) the complainant's representative lacked personal knowledge of the repair/renovation work allegedly covered by the disputed cheque; (2) no bills or documents proving such work were produced; and (3) the accused produced bills in his own name predating the property transfer, contradicting the complainant's claim. The court held that once presumptions are rebutted, the complainant must independently prove the legally enforceable debt—mere inconsistencies in the accused's defense are insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)
-
02-Mar-2026
Judgement
Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)
-
20-Jan-2026
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
20-Jan-2026
Judgement
Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)
-
11-Dec-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
Judgement
Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)
-
25-Nov-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
25-Nov-2025
Final Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)
-
29-Oct-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
29-Oct-2025
Final Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)
-
22-Sep-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
22-Sep-2025
Final Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)
-
29-Jul-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
29-Jul-2025
Final Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)
-
24-May-2025
Copy Of Judicial ProceedingsView PDF
-
24-May-2025
Final Arguments
Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)
-
27-Mar-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
27-Mar-2025
Misc./ Appearance
Additional Sessions Judge (Sftc)
-
26-Mar-2025
Copy Of OrderView PDF
-
26-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 90/2025
Case Summary: Manoj Pundir v. Sun Rose Trading Pvt. Ltd. (CA 90/2025) The appellate court acquitted Manoj Pundir of cheque dishonor charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, overturning the trial court's conviction and ₹22 lakh fine. The court found that statutory presumptions favoring the complainant were rebutted because: (1) the complainant's representative lacked personal knowledge of the repair/renovation work allegedly covered by the disputed cheque; (2) no bills or documents proving such work were produced; and (3) the accused produced bills in his own name predating the property transfer, contradicting the complainant's claim. The court held that once presumptions are rebutted, the complainant must independently prove the legally enforceable debt—mere inconsistencies in the accused's defense are insufficient. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts