MANOJ PUNDIR vs SUN ROSE TRADING PVT. LTD. — 89/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 14th March 2026.
CA - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: DLND010018092025
e-Filing Number
11-03-2025
Filing Number
723/2025
Filing Date
12-03-2025
Registration No
89/2025
Registration Date
26-03-2025
Court
District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC
Judge
10-Additional Sessions Judge (SFTC)
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANOJ PUNDIR
Respondent(s)
SUN ROSE TRADING PVT. LTD.
Hearing History
Judge: 10-Additional Sessions Judge (SFTC)
Disposed
Judgement
Judgement
Judgement
Final Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 20-01-2026 | Judgement |
| 11-12-2025 | Judgement |
| 25-11-2025 | Final Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 89/2025 Decision: The appellate court dismissed Manoj Pundir's appeal challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque for Rs. 45,35,950. The court upheld the trial court's conviction and fine of Rs. 66,50,000, finding the appellant failed to substantiate his defense that the cheque was merely a security deposit or that Sun Rose Trading owed him money for set-off. Key Reasoning: The court found all statutory elements of Section 138 satisfied: the cheque was drawn by the appellant, dishonored for insufficient funds, proper legal notice was issued, and the appellant failed to make payment. The appellant admitted signing the cheque but provided only unsubstantiated defenses without corroborating evidence, while the complainant produced the registered transfer deed establishing the legally enforceable liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Criminal Appeal No. 89/2025 Decision: The appellate court dismissed Manoj Pundir's appeal challenging his conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque for Rs. 45,35,950. The court upheld the trial court's conviction and fine of Rs. 66,50,000, finding the appellant failed to substantiate his defense that the cheque was merely a security deposit or that Sun Rose Trading owed him money for set-off. Key Reasoning: The court found all statutory elements of Section 138 satisfied: the cheque was drawn by the appellant, dishonored for insufficient funds, proper legal notice was issued, and the appellant failed to make payment. The appellant admitted signing the cheque but provided only unsubstantiated defenses without corroborating evidence, while the complainant produced the registered transfer deed establishing the legally enforceable liability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts