ADVANI AND CO. vs MAN INDUSRIRES — 9/2026
Case under Civil Procedure Code 1908 Section 24. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 24th March 2026.
T P (C) - TransferApplication
CNR: DLND010009352026
e-Filing Number
26-01-2026
Filing Number
624/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
9/2026
Registration Date
31-01-2026
Court
District and Sessions Judge,New Delhi, PHC
Judge
1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ADVANI AND CO.
Adv. Mujeeb Ur Rehman
Respondent(s)
MAN INDUSRIRES
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Principal District and Sessions Judge
Disposed
Misc./ Appearance
Misc./ Appearance
Misc./ Appearance
Misc./ Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | Misc./ Appearance |
| 02-03-2026 | Misc./ Appearance |
| 07-02-2026 | Misc./ Appearance |
| 31-01-2026 | Misc./ Appearance |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Advani & Co. v. Man Industries (T.P. No. 9/2026) The court allowed Advani & Co.'s petition to transfer Commercial Court Suit No. 324/2022 to a regular Civil Court, finding that a lawyer fee recovery dispute falls outside Commercial Court jurisdiction. The suit was transferred from Commercial Court-03 to District Judge-01, with the transferee court directed to continue proceedings from the stage reached before the Commercial Court, rather than starting a de novo trial, to prevent further delay and prejudice to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Advani & Co. v. Man Industries (T.P. No. 9/2026) The court allowed Advani & Co.'s petition to transfer Commercial Court Suit No. 324/2022 to a regular Civil Court, finding that a lawyer fee recovery dispute falls outside Commercial Court jurisdiction. The suit was transferred from Commercial Court-03 to District Judge-01, with the transferee court directed to continue proceedings from the stage reached before the Commercial Court, rather than starting a de novo trial, to prevent further delay and prejudice to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts